[mkgmap-dev] splitter that generates problem list
From Henning Scholland osm at aighes.de on Wed Nov 7 18:19:00 GMT 2012
Am 07.11.2012 19:06, schrieb WanMil: >> The profiling data shows that the CPU is most of the time >> busy with the pbf read and write routines, so I doubt that your disk >> is the bottleneck. > From my experience profiling is a very time consuming (=> CPU > consuming) task. So could it also be that the disk is not the bottleneck > while you profile the application but it is the bottleneck while you > don't profile it? (It's just a guess...) If I believe in TaskManager, splitter takes 17% CPU-usage. This means one core is completly busy. HDD as bottleneck was only meant in general. I'm running splitter and mkgmap (and all input and output) on a SSD. But I think this is not typical. Maybe it would increase performance, if max-area keep smaller and splitter runs multiple times. E.g. I run two splitter with max-area=512. Will try this. I don't know much about java, but would be possible, that splitter detects that and runs several instances automatical? Eg. read max-heap, max-cpu-cores, number of tiles, size of input. Henning
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] splitter that generates problem list
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] splitter that generates problem list
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list