[mkgmap-dev] version numbers
From Felix Hartmann extremecarver at gmail.com on Thu Nov 8 10:43:22 GMT 2012
Map created with mkgmap-runknown this is where it would be, had I compiled mkgmap with Linux.... On 08.11.2012 11:41, n Willink wrote: > Hi Felix > Forgive me if I'm a bit slow but > I can see the copyright and mapnumber,65310014 etc but where is the > actual reference to the mkgmap's version number? > Was it say compiled using 2179,2370 or non of these? > Even with the latest version of gmaptool I can't see it . > *From:* [hidden email] </user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5734857&i=0> > *Sent:* Thursday, November 08, 2012 10:22 AM > *To:* [hidden email] </user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5734857&i=1> > *Subject:* Re: version numbers > If you use gmaptool, and click on details, then you would see it... > > e.g. a sample output (makes me remember to change the sourcecode > attribution from ccbysa to odbl..., something that should be done in > trunk too...): > File: D:/Garmin/openmtbmap/us-northeast/65310014.img, length > 3437056 > Header: 06.11.2012 17:44:37, DSKIMG, XOR 00, V 0.00, Ms 0 > Mapset: US-Troy > fat: 400h - 600h - 4600h, block 512 > maps: 1, sub-files 5 > > Sub-file fat length > 65310014 RGN 600h 1692620 > 65310014 TRE 2200h 7820 > map 3e48d3e (65310014) > date 06.11.2012 17:44:39 > priority 31, parameters 1 4 23 0 > levels [13,14,16,18,19,20,21,22,24], zoom [88,7,6,5,4,3,2,1,0] > N: 43.593750, S: 42.714844, W: -73.696289, E: -72.817383 > OpenStreetMap and contributors > www.openstreetmap.org > Map data licenced under odbl > http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/ > Map created with mkgmap-runknown > Program released under the GPL > 65310014 LBL 2400h 210838 > CP 1252, Western European Sort > 65310014 NET 2800h 389486 > 65310014 NOD 3000h 1117500 > > Map length s-f CP prio PID FID name > 65310014 MPC 3418264 5 1252 31 > > > > End. > On 08.11.2012 11:04, n Willink wrote: >> Thanks Gerd >> I've not seen that I'm afraid even in the lbl >> *From:* <A >> href="wlmailhtml:/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5734847&i=0" >> rel=nofollow target=_top link="external" >> moz-do-not-send="true">[hidden email] >> *Sent:* Thursday, November 08, 2012 9:53 AM >> *To:* <A >> href="wlmailhtml:/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5734847&i=1" >> rel=nofollow target=_top link="external" >> moz-do-not-send="true">[hidden email] >> *Subject:* Re: version numbers >> Maybe you find "Map created with mkgmap-svn" or "Map created with >> mkgmap-unknown". I think that happened when building from source on a >> windows machine, don't know it that is fixed now. >> >> Gerd >> >> n Willink wrote >> Thanks for your advise. >> >> I'm looking at the raw data using my own software to parse the >> TRE ,RGN,LBL NOD MDR etc of an img >> >> As far as I can tell there is no reference to mkgmaps's version >> number , ie 2179,2370 in the img file itself. >> >> By difference I meant looking at the contents/order of maplevels >> & subfiles in TRE or the POIS found in MDR4 using the same osm >> but different versions of mkgmap >> >> Currently, I'm encountering some very strange & alarming >> behaviour when the gpx of a route disappears when zooming in >> .This only happens when I don't need splitter. >> I've never encounted the priority of an img override that of an IMG >> >> From: GerdP [via GIS] >> Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2012 9:18 AM >> To: n Willink >> Subject: Re: version numbers >> >> > >> >> > There is another issue which perhaps betrays mkgmaps modesty >> but at present >> > there is no way of telling which version has been used to >> create a gmapsupp >> > or img - it could be included in the copyright section? >> >> Hmm, you should find the string Map created with mkgmap-rxxxx in >> the *.img file. >> Don't you? >> >> > >> > I'm currently trying to compare imgs created by different >> versions of mkgmap >> > and analyse what causes their behaviour to be so different. >> >> What tool do you use to compare two img files? If you just >> compare the files, you >> will see a lot of differences even if you use the same mkgmap and >> the same input. >> My identical_output_v2.patch might help, but one has to adapt it >> to current mkgmap releases. >> See also >> http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Small-holes-in-boundary-coverage-tp5569161p5624523.html >> >> Ciao, >> Gerd >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > View this message in context: >> http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/version-numbers-tp5734654p5734827.html >> > Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at >> Nabble.com. >> > _______________________________________________ >> > mkgmap-dev mailing list >> > [hidden email] >> > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev >> _______________________________________________ >> mkgmap-dev mailing list >> [hidden email] >> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev >> >> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the >> discussion below: >> http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/version-numbers-tp5734654p5734831.html >> >> To start a new topic under Mkgmap Development, email <A >> href="wlmailhtml:/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5734845&i=0" >> rel=nofollow target=_top link="external">[hidden email] >> To unsubscribe from Mkgmap Development, click here. >> NAML >> No virus found in this message. >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >> Version: 2013.0.2742 / Virus Database: 2617/5880 - Release Date: >> 11/07/12 >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the >> discussion below: >> http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/version-numbers-tp5734654p5734845.html >> To start a new topic under Mkgmap Development, email <A >> href="wlmailhtml:/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5734847&i=2" >> rel=nofollow target=_top link="external" >> moz-do-not-send="true">[hidden email] >> To unsubscribe from Mkgmap Development, <A >> href="wlmailhtml:{970563C7-28FA-4C2E-B163-58995EF0D074}mid://00000048/" >> rel=nofollow target=_top link="external" moz-do-not-send="true">click >> here. >> NAML >> <http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml> >> >> >> No virus found in this message. >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com> >> Version: 2013.0.2742 / Virus Database: 2617/5880 - Release Date: 11/07/12 >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> View this message in context: Re: version numbers >> <http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/version-numbers-tp5734654p5734847.html> >> Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive >> <http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Mkgmap-Development-f5324443.html> at >> Nabble.com. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> mkgmap-dev mailing list >> <A href="wlmailhtml:/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5734853&i=0" rel=nofollow target=_top link="external">[hidden email] >> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev > > -- > keep on biking and discovering new trails > > Felix > openmtbmap.org &www.velomap.org > > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > <A > href="wlmailhtml:/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5734853&i=1" > rel=nofollow target=_top link="external">[hidden email] > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the > discussion below: > http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/version-numbers-tp5734654p5734853.html > To start a new topic under Mkgmap Development, email [hidden email] > </user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5734857&i=2> > To unsubscribe from Mkgmap Development, click here. > NAML > <http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml> > > > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com> > Version: 2013.0.2742 / Virus Database: 2617/5880 - Release Date: 11/07/12 > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > View this message in context: Re: version numbers > <http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/version-numbers-tp5734654p5734857.html> > Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive > <http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Mkgmap-Development-f5324443.html> at > Nabble.com. > > > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev -- keep on biking and discovering new trails Felix openmtbmap.org & www.velomap.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20121108/e260793c/attachment.html
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] version numbers
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] version numbers
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list