[mkgmap-dev] splitter r232
From Henning Scholland osm at aighes.de on Fri Nov 16 09:11:23 GMT 2012
Am 16.11.2012 09:09, schrieb Gerd Petermann: > Hi all, > > > > > 11000004: 1800192,1406976 to 1968128,1681408 > > > > In this tile (north-western Turkey) there are missing two ferry-routes > > (Yalta-Istanbul and Sivastopol-Istanbul). As I opened the tile in josm, > > I discovered also, that there are several objects in that tile, which > > shouldn't be in it. Eg. boundary of USA, Russia > > reg. the ferry-routes: > I can't say for sure, but I'd say these ferry lines really don't cross > the tile. > I think it is a good idea to write the tile bordes in gpx format, this > will help > to answer such questions. An easy check is to display the map in MapSource and choose one tile, so this tile will be highlighted. I created an osm-file with 11000004-boundary and the two ferry-routes. http://www.aighes.de/data/11000004.zip With open-data-PlugIn you can also open kml-files to josm ;) > reg. "objects that shouldn't be in it": > I would accept Russia for now, but USA really sounds strange. > I think the reason is the very simple that is used now: > For a multipolygon (or boundary), splitter simply calculates the > bounding box > of all ways. The result is a rectangle. Every tile that intersects > this rectangle contain the > complete relation. > The advantage of this method is that splitter doesn't have to > calculate the real MP (which > invvolves many special cases like incomplete data, holes etc). I > wanted to leave this > to mkgmap. Ah..thats logical. Russia is crossing 180°/-180° > For most boundaries, this simple alg. works quite well, because the > bbox of the boundary doesn't > contain too much other stuff. > The bbox for Russia is obviously very big and contains a large area > which doesn't belong > to Russia. A real problem is USA (and probably other countries with > external territories: > Because of Hawai and some other islands the bbox for USA covers almost > half of the planet. > I hope I can find an alternative algorithm that is still simple and > fast, but doesn't > make this error. I think, this would be acceptable. Splitter would save data with overlap=0, so there shouldn't be a real problem, if these to boundaries were copied to a lot of tiles. Henning -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20121116/0bab3578/attachment.html
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] splitter r232
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] splitter r232
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list