[mkgmap-dev] splitter r236
From Gerd Petermann gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com on Sat Nov 17 14:19:29 GMT 2012
> > Henning Scholland wrote > >> Hi Gerd, > >> r236 works fine for planet. Log: http://www.aighes.de/data/mkgmap.zip > > Yes, that really looks much better than the previous logs. The changes in > > the run times > > for the diverse passes meet my assumptions. > > I guess you have also verified the missing fairy lines do appear now in > > 11000004 ? > Yes, they are fine now. Good to hear :-) > > > Henning Scholland wrote > >> Another thought: What about only analysing the ways, if they cross/leave > >> a tile and keep them in mind. Afterwards read all relations and check, > >> if they contains a way, which is kept in mind. So relations must not be > >> builded to, but only the needed relations would be in the tile. > > I think this would not detect MP that enclose a tile > > (without having any way or point in it or crossing it). > Hmm...yes, you're right. It's very tricky: rels with type=boundary > should only be in the tiles, there they have a way in and > type=multipolygon should be in each tile, the area is touching. Hmm, so we would write complete relation if they have type=multipolygon, but allow incomplete relations if type=boundary ? For the latter I would just make sure that the ways that are crossing the tile are complete. Sounds reasonable to me. Any objections? Ciao, Gerd -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20121117/f69cbef0/attachment.html
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] splitter r236
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] motorway_link lacks oneway check
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list