[mkgmap-dev] splitter r247
From WanMil wmgcnfg at web.de on Tue Nov 27 12:12:53 GMT 2012
> > Reg. overlap: I agree that overlap should be ignored with --keep-complete. > I just don't have enough experience to decide this alone. > I wasnot sure whether overlap=0 should be forced with --keep-complete or > whether it should be ignored only if user did not explicitely specify a > value. > I think forcing overlap=0 is the better solution. > There is a *small* exception where overlap=0 does not produce the same results like overlap>0 with keep-complete. The new process-destination option copies destination tags from links to motorways/trunks. In case the motorway intersects the bbox and the link does not the destination tag will not be copied to the motorway with overlap=0 because the link is missing in the tile data. So I propose to keep the overlap parameter but default it to 0 with keep-complete. The described case should be *very* seldom... WanMil
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] splitter r247
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] splitter r247
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list