[mkgmap-dev] splitter r247
From GerdP gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com on Thu Nov 29 12:31:44 GMT 2012
Hi Lambertus, Lambertus wrote > Some results for r247, I hope it is of any use: > > This version is able to split the planet (r246 could not) but needs more > memory then r202. Using -Xmx4000m an OutOfMemoryException occurs but not > with -Xmx6000m. > > Number of stored ids: 19,330,031 require ca. 2.04 bytes per pair. > 1224726 chunks are used, the avg. number of values in one 64-chunk is 15. > Map details: bytes/overhead 22,288,890 / 17,251,542, overhead includes 2 > arrays with 8 MB > RLE compresion info: compressed / uncompressed size / ratio: 6,245,541 / > 19,330,024 / 68% > JVM Memory Info: Current 5969MB (1422MB used, 4547MB free) Max 5969MB > Full Node tests: 334,886,250 > Quick Node tests: 114,029,611 > Thread worker-0 has finished > Thread worker-1 has finished > Thread worker-2 has finished > Distribution pass(es) took 15727941 ms (4h 20m) > > $ java -version > java version "1.7.0_09" > OpenJDK Runtime Environment (IcedTea7 2.3.3) (7u9-2.3.3-0ubuntu1~12.04.1) > OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 23.2-b09, mixed mode) Do you use the same parameters for both versions? In that case r247 should not require much more or less memory compared to r202. If you have the complete logs, please send them to me, I like to know in which phase it is likely to have memory problems. Gerd -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/splitter-r247-tp5737673p5738186.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] splitter r247
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] splitter r247
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list