[mkgmap-dev] splitter r247

Thu Nov 29 21:16:40 GMT 2012

GerdP wrote
> Hi Lambertus,
> 
> thanks for the input. Yes, the log shows that the keep-complete functions
> require more then 5GB.
> This is okay, splitter has to save more information for this compared to
> r202.
> 
> ciao,
> Gerd

Oh oh!
I looked again at this logs and wondered why some numbers did not change
during the different passes.
I found out that the 7 passes in the ProblemListProcessor are 
more or less nonsense. The intention was to save memory by processing only a
set of writers
in each pass, but in fact all 7 passes store the node informations for all
writers.
In short: splitter requires either much less memory whhen this bug is
corrected,
or you can run everything in one pass if you specify --max-areas=2048
I hope I can fix this soon.

Gerd

--
View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/splitter-r247-tp5737673p5738287.html
Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.