[mkgmap-dev] splitter maximum tile size
From WanMil wmgcnfg at web.de on Sat Dec 1 10:26:32 GMT 2012
Hi Gerd, Ok, we should first investigate if there really is a limit for a tile size. Just for now it may be good if splitter issues a warning for tiles that exceeds a limit, e.g. "Tile xxxxx.osm.pbf covers more than n° in latitude. This may cause problems with mkgmap when using one of the options bounds, generate-sea and precomp-sea. <some hints what can be done to avoid that>". I think my testcase is not ideal. I have used a polygon that covered the whole tile. But this causes large (too large) img sizes because the polygon has to be split into many subpolygons when mkgmap splits into subdivisions. I think instead it is better to use one POI node in each corner of the bbox. I will try again and report about my findings. WanMil > Hi WanMil, > > I think the maximum values should be as large as possible. When > splitting planet, we have a huge tile covering > an area in the pacific, this tile has almost no nodes. If splitter has > to create tiles with max. 20 degrees width > we probably see tiles without nodes. > > Gerd > > > Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 18:18:02 +0100 > From: wmgcnfg at web.de > To: mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk > Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] splitter maximum tile size > >> Thorsten Kukuk wrote >>>> >>>> No, there is no limit for the maximum tiles size for now. Thanks for the >>>> hint. >>>> What is the limit? I guess it is not a constant, but depends on >>>> resolution >>>> and other >>>> values? Unfortunately the test data is gone and I didn't download it. >>> >>> If you want to look at the problem, I can try to regenerate the >>> data again. >> >> I am not sure if the problem has to be solved in splitter or in mkgmap. >> Anyway, please try to reproduce it. >> I also like to know why mkgmap has problems with tiles that contain only >> very few nodes. Or is it the gps device that has problems? >> >> Gerd > > I played a little bit with a small testfile how large a tile can be. The > attached test file has the maximum size which works for me: > <bounds minlat="0.0" minlon="0.0" maxlat="85.0" maxlon="179.98"/> > Larger bounds cannot be put into a single tile. > > For large tiles mkgmap requires much memory problem if the bounds > parameter is set. They need to be completely loaded with a high memory > consumption. > > I don't know if there is a hard limit for the tile bounds size. Maybe > using some limits in splitter for the maximum latitude and maximum > longitude size would remove some problems, e.g. max lat = 20, max long = 20. > > WanMil > > > > _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk > http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk > http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev >
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] splitter maximum tile size
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] splitter maximum tile size
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list