[mkgmap-dev] splitter r257
From GerdP gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com on Fri Dec 14 11:48:52 GMT 2012
Felix Hartmann-2 wrote > will try it, please update the help file too! Hmm, what help file? The wiki or something in the sources? Felix Hartmann-2 wrote > I think if you use --keep-complete, then you should not specify > --overlap at all, right? If you specify --keep-complete, the default for --overlap is 0. If you specify keep-complete with a non-zero value for overlap, you should see a warning. Felix Hartmann-2 wrote > Because on 256 I got crahes while using --keep-complete --overlap=0... > which is however exactly what is recommended in the help file. I don't > think there is any need for overlap if --keep-complete is used, or could > there be reasons? If you can reproduce the crash with r257, please send details how to reproduce it. Felix Hartmann-2 wrote > Also I think most people will want --keep-complete by default, except if > overlap is >0 I did not dare to make it the default, but I agree that most people will want it. So, if I got you right, splitter should set keep-complete=true if user specifies neither overlap nor keep-complete=false ? Felix Hartmann-2 wrote > could you further specify this please? I cannot see how to enable it > (which I would expect if it is really experimental and not only new and > needs to be tested). > > - correct handling of holes in polygon (experimental) Well, the osmosis polygon file format allows to define areas with holes. I don't see any need for that, but I tried to make sure that nothing stupid happens if a user tries a poly file with hole(s). Gerd -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/splitter-r257-tp5740402p5740415.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] splitter r257
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] splitter r257
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list