[mkgmap-dev] splitter: relations to be checked with keep-complete=true
From Gerd Petermann gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com on Sun Dec 16 12:35:36 GMT 2012
> I think this is not required as long as mkgmap is not able to handle all > of such relations: > > * subrelations: I think subrelations are not handled by mkgmap so they > can be ignored completely by keep-complete. (Keep the code, sometime > mkgmap will handle them ;-) no problem, I can just comment out the call of markParentRels() > > * relations: I found code for the following relation types only: > multipolygon > boundary (is ignored by splitter?) > restriction > through_route > I think all other relations can be ignored by keep-complete. (I don't > know about the special marine code...) > > What do you think about? Any objections? Up to now, splitter r260 doesn't ignore any relation. It just has a special handling for multipolygon relations to find enclosed tiles. This was previously also done for boundaries, but that turned out to be too much data. Gerd -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20121216/fce0e47b/attachment.html
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] splitter: relations to be checked with keep-complete=true
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] splitter r261: performance improvements
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list