[mkgmap-dev] There is not enough room in a single garmin map for all the input data
From GerdP gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com on Sat Jan 5 15:32:41 GMT 2013
Hi, Steve Ratcliffe wrote > The fact that highwayCount is incremented always is harmless in itself > and necessary, since at that point we do not know what is a road and > what isn't (highwayCount is not a great name, except that it is not > used for ordinary lines). Obviously we shouldn't be doing any specific > road processing later on and that needs looking into, certainly > shouldn't be calling removeShortArcsByWhatever() on anything that > isn't a road. That whole area of the code is now quite old and was > written before we knew how routing worked so we might want to > rearrange it differently now. Attached is a patch that moves the removeShortArcsByMergingNodes() to StyledConverter, so that it now is only called for ways that are converted to MapRoads. As expected, the generated img files are smaller because less points in ways are preserved. I did a quick test if routing still works (on my Oregon), so maybe this is all that has to be done. I still have the feeling that most of the code in this method is obsolete, but it's hard to say when you cannot test it. Gerd removeShortArcs_v1.patch <http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/file/n5742932/removeShortArcs_v1.patch> -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/There-is-not-enough-room-in-a-single-garmin-map-for-all-the-input-data-tp5741801p5742932.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] Some point icons from TYP file don't display
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] fuelling the brand
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list