[mkgmap-dev] Possible memory reduction in mkgmap
From GerdP gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com on Thu Jan 10 19:01:08 GMT 2013
WanMil wrote >> The disadvantage: OSMId2ObjectMap uses fastutil.jar, which is not used in >> mkgmap >> until now. I could try to change OSMId2ObjectMap so that it runs without >> fastutil.jar, >> but that would mean to invent the wheel again. >> >> Comments? >> >> Gerd >> > > Sounds good. > I think it's ok to add the fastutil.jar to mkgmap. Fine. I would prefer that Steve does that because I have no experience with the ivy configuration. I think about coding a LinkedOSMId2ObjectMap as well. This would allow to replace many instances of HashMap<Long,xyz> and LinkedHashMap<Long,xyz> I have to find out if it really helps. Gerd -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Possible-memory-reduction-in-mkgmap-tp5743567p5743822.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] Possible memory reduction in mkgmap
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] Possible memory reduction in mkgmap
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list