[mkgmap-dev] Regression in splitter r277 compared to r270? Area too small ...
From GerdP gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com on Mon Jan 14 13:13:18 GMT 2013
Thorsten Kukuk wrote > Where there any changes which let expect such a result? Well, most changes were optimizations, but some also change the output, r277 compared to r270: - keep-complete is the default - Changes suggested by WanMil to reduce the number of problem candidates - different handling of polygon files Do you see different areas.list files or just different output files? Please send me the logs of both versions for detailed analyses. Ciao, Gerd -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Regression-in-splitter-r277-compared-to-r270-Area-too-small-tp5744427p5744439.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] Regression in splitter r277 compared to r270? Area too small ...
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] Regression in splitter r277 compared to r270? Area too small ...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list