[mkgmap-dev] Regression in splitter r277 compared to r270? Area too small ...
From GerdP gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com on Mon Jan 14 16:14:38 GMT 2013
Thorsten Kukuk wrote > mkgmap.cfg is basemap/mkgmap.DACH.cfg: > family-id: 7120 > product-id: 1 > draw-priority: 10 > mapname: 71201001 > > maps.cfg contains descriptions for each input file: > description: DE-Rostock > input-file: 71200148.osm.pbf > >> Is it mkgmap r2443 without any patches? > > It contains only patches to build without network, but > no code changes. OK, that's what I thought. Are you able to reproduce the error when you replace -c maps.cfg by r271-71200148.osm.pbf ? Gerd -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Regression-in-splitter-r277-compared-to-r270-Area-too-small-tp5744427p5744474.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] Regression in splitter r277 compared to r270? Area too small ...
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] Regression in splitter r277 compared to r270? Area too small ...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list