[mkgmap-dev] Address include in polygons style file superfluous?
From Gerd Petermann gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com on Thu Jan 17 15:21:07 GMT 2013
Hi WanMil, Sounds good to me. Afaik my Oregon 450t doesn't allow to search for anything like an area. Well, a camping site is an area, but I think one only wants to search fort the reception. Gerd > Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 19:58:15 +0100 > From: wmgcnfg at web.de > To: mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk > Subject: [mkgmap-dev] Address include in polygons style file superfluous? > > Hi, > > I have started writing some pages for the new mkgmap documentation about > address search. This made me thinking if the address include is required > for the polygons style file. Is it possible to see the address > information of a polygon in a Garmin map (or better a mkgmap created map)? > > If the answer is no we could remove the include from the polygons style > file which saves some memory and some processing steps. Additionally we > could remove the processing of polygons from the LocationHook. > > The only thing that need to be changed is the -add-pois-to-areas option. > The POIs created by this option must be worked out by the LocationHook > because the polygons do not contain the address info any more. But I > think this would be easy. > > Any comments? > > WanMil > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk > http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20130117/c578eff4/attachment.html
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] Address include in polygons style file superfluous?
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] Address include in polygons style file superfluous?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list