[mkgmap-dev] Question reg. LayerFilterChain.addElement
From GerdP gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com on Mon Feb 4 18:13:38 GMT 2013
Hi, Steve Ratcliffe wrote > It was my intention that a filter either calls doFilter or drops the > element. the comment for addElement implies that the following filters should not be skipped. * <p>Although this is based on servlet filters, there is a complication in * that we want to be able to split up an element, this lead to the * {@link #addElement(MapElement)} method which in effect creates a new chain * that is at the same stage as the current one and with the same final * destination. So I think I found an error and I will try to fix it. Gerd -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Question-reg-LayerFilterChain-addElement-tp5748072p5748078.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] Question reg. LayerFilterChain.addElement
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] Question reg. LayerFilterChain.addElement
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list