[mkgmap-dev] PATCH v1: highwayCount
From GerdP gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com on Sun Feb 10 19:51:04 GMT 2013
Hi Steve, the test doesn't show any difference, so I think it will not detect the problem that I see. I try to describe it more detailed: - I've added a call to GpxCreator.createGpx for each line that is part of a road - I've made sure that all gpx files were written with unique names so that I don't overwrite something. Here's the patch I've used: order.patch <http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/file/n5748813/order.patch> I've executed the modifed version once with --transparent, renamed the gpx dir , again without Then I've compared the resulting gpx files and found a few ones that had different contents. These showed that the order of the line segments changed. The reason is that we first divide the roads into segements, then distribute the segments to different sub divisions and finally process the subdivisions without looking at the order of the line segments. So, if this matters, the result of the test should show whether or not the segments of a road are saved in order or not. Attached is also a zip archive showing the different results for a special way. gpx.zip <http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/file/n5748813/gpx.zip> Gerd GerdP wrote > Hi Steve, > Steve Ratcliffe wrote >> Hi Gerd >> >>> I found differences for roads which are divided into multiple parts . >>> The polyline parts "arrive" in different order in the >>> RoadDef.addPolylineRef >>> method. >> >> OK so I wrote code to check this. However... >> >> 1. In a complete map of the UK I did not see a single example of there >> being more than one line in the same RoadDef (at the same level). >> >> 2. Lines joining within the same RoadDef is not strictly required as >> there are many unconnected lines in non-mkgmap maps. >> >> I do see the breakage with --transparent in a UK map, so it looks as if >> there is another reason for it. > thanks, I will try. > I saw these effects in the austria map. > The effect of the --transparent option is only a change in the number of > shapes. This means also a change in the number of sub divisions and > how different parts of a road are distributed to these sub divisions. > So, --transparent doesn't directly cause a problem. > > Gerd -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/PATCH-v1-highwayCount-tp5748554p5748813.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] PATCH v1: highwayCount
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] PATCH v1: highwayCount
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list