[mkgmap-dev] boundary relations in splitter

Tue Feb 12 08:39:58 GMT 2013

Hi Minko,

Minko-2 wrote
> Why is option 1 too simple? Most important is that it is effective and
> customizable.
> I would go for 1a, add an include list and I can add my own options, like
> national_park and protected_area.
> 
> Maybe a good idea to exclude mp boundaries too. 

Just to make sure: with hard coded I meant hard coded in java source, so you
can't customize it without changing the source and compile the changes.

Gerd

--
View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/boundary-relations-in-splitter-tp5749069p5749074.html
Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.