[mkgmap-dev] Support for "through_route" relations?

Sat Apr 13 17:03:11 BST 2013

Thanks for this. I'd already realised a more generic approach was better 
than an mkgmap specific one.

Thanks

Paul

On 12/04/13 08:25, Henning Scholland wrote:
> Am 12.04.2013 00:02, schrieb News:
>> Like you I think this is a useful option which should stay so I guess
>> it's down to us to drum up some action on the wiki although I'll confess
>> that I don't know where the best place to start is as I haven't spent
>> much time on any wiki let alone one as large and well established as
>> OSM. However if you feel you have the knowledge to make a start point me
>> at the relevant page and I'll gladly pitch in
>
> Hi Paul,
> typical you should set up a proposal. If you search the wiki for
> proposal you should find the necessary information. After creating the
> proposal you should write to tagging-ML and partisipate in a discussion
> with other mappers. If this relation is already used, this discussion
> could be quite short. Just a hint: don't argue with 'mkgmap needs it',
> but say 'router will need it'. ;)
>
> Henning
>
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>