[mkgmap-dev] Overview2 branch - options file typo?

Mon May 6 18:47:32 BST 2013

oh, and I would suppose a "," comma is missing too!
On 06.05.2013 13:46, GerdP wrote:
> Hi Felix,
>
> yes, it was a typo. I tested with different values. I have no preference and
> no experience,
> so I'd be happy to hear proposals.
>
> Gerd
>
>
> Felix Hartmann-2 wrote
>> Is there a typo in the options file?
>> "overview-levels = 5:16 6:18"
>>
>> shouldn't that be 5:16 6:14 ???
>> I think that if the numbering continues, further levels should be
>> decreasing resolution. So if 18 and 16 should be used in the overview
>> map (but why have 17 then as normal map resolution??):
>> it should read "5:18 6:16" -- However I thought overlapping resolutions
>> is not good form (actually dunno what happens).
>>
>>
>> IMHO 5:16 6:14 is quite good as conservative value. (continent maps).
>> Maybe we should even move to 4:17 5:16 6:14 in the overview map (and 0-3
>> in the normal map)...
>>
>>
>> As for the routable basemap on newer garmin GPS. Maybe we could create a
>> non routable mkgmap created basemap and recommend people to use it
>> instead?
>> _______________________________________________
>> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>> mkgmap-dev at .org
>> http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Overview2-branch-options-file-typo-tp5759855p5759856.html
> Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev