[mkgmap-dev] Overview2 branch - options file typo?

From GerdP gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com on Mon May 6 21:25:01 BST 2013

Hi Felix,

does the last call create the *_ovm.img files ?
If you look at one, does it contain anything (points,lines,polygons) ?

If not, maybe your style doesn't yet put anything to the low resolutions?

Gerd


Felix Hartmann-2 wrote
> yes thanks I know - but didn't notice I had typed it wrong...
> 
> As for the input files:
> I use:
> -c template.%countryx% 7*.img
> -- whereas template.%country% contains only the pbf input files - and 
> 7*.img are precompiled contour files...
> 
> However I also in a second run, just create the map from the created 
> *.img files, without contourlines (could change the order too - as long 
> as the result is right). It would be perfect if I could specify the  
> *_ovm.img for the second run (which is only used for creating an 
> additional tdb/overview_map - that doesn't include the contourlines). 
> The style-file for the 7*.img contourlines is of course different. The 
> 7*.img being contourlines - only need to be included without any map 
> information - as the overview map doesn't need contourlines (that would 
> be next to impossible - except maybe with 1000m equidistance anyhow).
> 
> 
> However - the following call, also returns me an empty basemap - even 
> though there is only one input (austria splitted):
> c:\OpenMTBMap\maps>start /low /b /wait java -jar -Xms6000M -Xmx10300M 
> c:\openmtbmap\mkgmap.jar --max-jobs=8 --generate-sea --latin1 
> --precomp-sea=c:\openmtbmap\maps\sea 
> "--style-file=c:\openmtbmap\openmtbmap_style" --nsis --index 
> --adjust-turn-headings --add-pois-to-areas --ignore-maxspeeds 
> --reduce-point-density=3 --x-reduce-point-density-polygon=6 
> --x-housenumbers --remove-short-arcs=5.4 --link-pois-to-ways 
> --ignore-turn-restrictions --min-size-polygon=12 
> --description=openmtbmap_at --show-profiles=1 
> --location-autofill=bounds,is_in,nearest 
> --bounds=c:\openmtbmap\maps\bounds --route --country-abbr=at 
> --country-name=austria --mapname=63650000 --family-id=6365 
> --product-id=1 --series-name=openmtbmap_austria_06.05.2013 
> --family-name=mtbmap_at_06.05.2013 --tdbfile --overview-mapname=mapsetc 
> --keep-going --area-name="austria_06.05.2013_openmtbmap.org" -c 
> c:\openmtbmap\maps\template.austria
> 
> On 06.05.2013 15:01, GerdP wrote:
>> Hi Felix,
>>
>> it's ant clean, not clear.
>>
>> reg. the error message: I have to find a way to handle this. The program
>> wants either all files with an *_ovm.img or none, and all *_ovm.img
>> should
>> have the same levels, else this error is triggered.
>> The problem is that the overview builder doesn't know the style that was
>> used to create the *.img files,
>> esp. not if multiple styles were used. So I decided to read the levels
>> from
>> the first *_ovm.img file
>> and use it for the overview map. This doesn't work if not all files come
>> with a *_ovm.img
>>
>> Gerd
>>
>>
>>
>> Felix Hartmann-2 wrote
>>> and the resulting overview map, is completly empty...
>>> could this be related to using besides the OSM as input, also adding
>>> contourlines precompiled?
>>> On 06.05.2013 14:39, Felix Hartmann wrote:
>>>> ups yes, I had a typo and did ant clear - which doesn#t exist in my
>>>> build file -- however I run into the following problem:
>>>>
>>>> SEVERE (OverviewMapDataSource): invalid attempt to change map levels
>>>>
>>>> using the following "options" file:
>>>> levels = 0:24, 1:22, 2:21, 3:20, 4:19, 5:18
>>>> overview-levels = 6:17, 7:16, 8:14
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 06.05.2013 14:10, GerdP wrote:
>>>>> Hi Felix,
>>>>>
>>>>> did you compile from source? If yes, please try ant clean first.
>>>>>
>>>>> Gerd
>>>>>
>>>>> Felix Hartmann-2 wrote
>>>>>> for a conservative approach - yes. Though I think adding resolution
>>>>>> 17
>>>>>> to the overview map, would be quite good (don't know if for Asia or
>>>>>> Europe continent maps however, the overview map would become too big
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> fail to compile).
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 06.05.2013 13:53, GerdP wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi Felix,
>>>>>>> so you suggest  this?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> levels = 0:24, 1:22, 2:20, 3:18
>>>>>>> overview-levels = 4:16, 5:14
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Gerd
>>>>>> BTW - I have a problem with the overview branch - and my style
>>>>>> (didn't
>>>>>> try default one yet):
>>>>>>
>>>>>> java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
>>>>>> uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.build.LocatorUtil.getNameTags(Luk/me/parabola/util/EnhancedProperties;)Ljava/util/List;
>>>>>>
>>>>>>            at
>>>>>> uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.reader.osm.LinkDestinationHook.init(LinkDestinationHook.java:64)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>            at
>>>>>> uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.reader.osm.OsmMapDataSource.pluginChain(OsmMapDataSource.java:182)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>            at
>>>>>> uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.reader.osm.OsmMapDataSource.setupHandler(OsmMapDataSource.java:150)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>            at
>>>>>> uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.reader.osm.bin.OsmBinMapDataSource.load(OsmBinMapDataSource.java:49)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>            at
>>>>>> uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.reader.osm.OsmMapDataSource.load(OsmMapDataSource.java:124)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>            at
>>>>>> uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.main.MapMaker.loadFromFile(MapMaker.java:155)
>>>>>>            at
>>>>>> uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.main.MapMaker.makeMap(MapMaker.java:57)
>>>>>>            at uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.main.Main$1.call(Main.java:234)
>>>>>>            at uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.main.Main$1.call(Main.java:231)
>>>>>>            at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(Unknown
>>>>>> Source)
>>>>>>            at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(Unknown Source)
>>>>>>            at
>>>>>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(Unknown
>>>>>> Source)
>>>>>>            at
>>>>>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(Unknown
>>>>>> Source)
>>>>>>            at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
>>>>>> Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
>>>>>> uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.build.LocatorUtil.getNameTags(Luk/me/parabola/util/EnhancedProperties;)Ljava/util/List;
>>>>>>
>>>>>>            at uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.build.Locator.
>>>>>>
>>> 
> <init>
>>>>>> (Locator.java:51)
>>>>>>            at uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.build.Locator.
>>>>>>
>>> 
> <init>
>>>>>> (Locator.java:47)
>>>>>>            at
>>>>>> uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.build.MapBuilder.
>>>>>>
>>> 
> <init>
>>>>>> (MapBuilder.java:146)
>>>>>>            at
>>>>>> uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.combiners.OverviewBuilder.writeOverviewMap(OverviewBuilder.java:91)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>            at
>>>>>> uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.combiners.OverviewBuilder.onFinish(OverviewBuilder.java:84)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>            at
>>>>>> uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.main.Main.endOptions(Main.java:536)
>>>>>>            at
>>>>>> uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.CommandArgsReader.readArgs(CommandArgsReader.java:128)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>            at uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.main.Main.main(Main.java:119)
>>>>>>> Felix Hartmann-2 wrote
>>>>>>>> oh, and I would suppose a "," comma is missing too!
>>>>>>>> On 06.05.2013 13:46, GerdP wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hi Felix,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> yes, it was a typo. I tested with different values. I have no
>>>>>>>>> preference
>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>> no experience,
>>>>>>>>> so I'd be happy to hear proposals.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Gerd
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Felix Hartmann-2 wrote
>>>>>>>>>> Is there a typo in the options file?
>>>>>>>>>> "overview-levels = 5:16 6:18"
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> shouldn't that be 5:16 6:14 ???
>>>>>>>>>> I think that if the numbering continues, further levels should be
>>>>>>>>>> decreasing resolution. So if 18 and 16 should be used in the
>>>>>>>>>> overview
>>>>>>>>>> map (but why have 17 then as normal map resolution??):
>>>>>>>>>> it should read "5:18 6:16" -- However I thought overlapping
>>>>>>>>>> resolutions
>>>>>>>>>> is not good form (actually dunno what happens).
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> IMHO 5:16 6:14 is quite good as conservative value. (continent
>>>>>>>>>> maps).
>>>>>>>>>> Maybe we should even move to 4:17 5:16 6:14 in the overview map
>>>>>>>>>> (and
>>>>>>>>>> 0-3
>>>>>>>>>> in the normal map)...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> As for the routable basemap on newer garmin GPS. Maybe we could
>>>>>>>>>> create
>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>> non routable mkgmap created basemap and recommend people to use
>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>> instead?
>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>>>> mkgmap-dev at .org
>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>> View this message in context:
>>>>>>>>> http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Overview2-branch-options-file-typo-tp5759855p5759856.html
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at
>>>>>>>>> Nabble.com.
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> mkgmap-dev at .org
>>>>>>>>> http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>> mkgmap-dev at .org
>>>>>>>> http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>> View this message in context:
>>>>>>> http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Overview2-branch-options-file-typo-tp5759855p5759858.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> mkgmap-dev at .org
>>>>>>> http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>>>>>> mkgmap-dev at .org
>>>>>> http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> View this message in context:
>>>>> http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Overview2-branch-options-file-typo-tp5759855p5759861.html
>>>>> Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>>>>>
>>> mkgmap-dev at .org
>>>>> http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>>> mkgmap-dev at .org
>>> http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Overview2-branch-options-file-typo-tp5759855p5759868.html
>> Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> _______________________________________________
>> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>> 

> mkgmap-dev at .org

>> http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list

> mkgmap-dev at .org

> http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev





--
View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Overview2-branch-options-file-typo-tp5759855p5759878.html
Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

---

• Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] Overview2 branch - options file typo?
• Next message: [mkgmap-dev] Overview2 branch - options file typo?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list