[mkgmap-dev] Overview2 branch - options file typo?
From Gerd Petermann gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com on Mon May 6 22:06:43 BST 2013
OK, and thanks for the proposals. Gerd > Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 17:01:00 -0400 > From: extremecarver at gmail.com > To: mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk > Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Overview2 branch - options file typo? > > Just to clarify the naming issue - just like the default I use: > --mapname=%FID%0000 > > So subsequent calls for %FID%*.img are also taking the ovm_img files > into the overview_map/tdb. Calling > "%FID%????.img doesn't work on cmd.exe (that would be great - so I could > exclude the _ovm.img) AFAIK. > > Therefore naming ovm_%FID%.img would be the better option. > > > Oh and sorry for my mistakes - I'm working over very slow internet > connection from my laptop. - So it's much harder to implement changes > compared to working from a nice big monitor and fast internet.... > On 06.05.2013 16:46, Felix Hartmann wrote: > > ups, sorry. Actually it is working as expected - but I missed the > > options file. I didn't notice that due to the latest style-file > > reading changes - I had to move the style into a new directory (else > > additional folders inside the style-file directory would stop mkgmap - > > whereas before it was fine) and on copying the options file was not > > copied. > > > > So it looks like, that with or without additional files, the overview > > map is created correctly... - GREAT. > > > > I've got one little problem though - and that is the naming of the > > ovm.img files. It would be great if they could be called ovm_*.img > > instead of *_ovm.img - that change would make sure that they are > > a) not taken into the map as actual map .img files for subsequent > > mkgmap calls using MapID*.img calls, > > b) are not included into the NSIS installer > > On 06.05.2013 16:25, GerdP wrote: > >> Hi Felix, > >> > >> does the last call create the *_ovm.img files ? > >> If you look at one, does it contain anything (points,lines,polygons) ? > >> > >> If not, maybe your style doesn't yet put anything to the low > >> resolutions? > >> > >> Gerd > >> > >> > >> Felix Hartmann-2 wrote > >>> yes thanks I know - but didn't notice I had typed it wrong... > >>> > >>> As for the input files: > >>> I use: > >>> -c template.%countryx% 7*.img > >>> -- whereas template.%country% contains only the pbf input files - and > >>> 7*.img are precompiled contour files... > >>> > >>> However I also in a second run, just create the map from the created > >>> *.img files, without contourlines (could change the order too - as long > >>> as the result is right). It would be perfect if I could specify the > >>> *_ovm.img for the second run (which is only used for creating an > >>> additional tdb/overview_map - that doesn't include the contourlines). > >>> The style-file for the 7*.img contourlines is of course different. The > >>> 7*.img being contourlines - only need to be included without any map > >>> information - as the overview map doesn't need contourlines (that would > >>> be next to impossible - except maybe with 1000m equidistance anyhow). > >>> > >>> > >>> However - the following call, also returns me an empty basemap - even > >>> though there is only one input (austria splitted): > >>> c:\OpenMTBMap\maps>start /low /b /wait java -jar -Xms6000M -Xmx10300M > >>> c:\openmtbmap\mkgmap.jar --max-jobs=8 --generate-sea --latin1 > >>> --precomp-sea=c:\openmtbmap\maps\sea > >>> "--style-file=c:\openmtbmap\openmtbmap_style" --nsis --index > >>> --adjust-turn-headings --add-pois-to-areas --ignore-maxspeeds > >>> --reduce-point-density=3 --x-reduce-point-density-polygon=6 > >>> --x-housenumbers --remove-short-arcs=5.4 --link-pois-to-ways > >>> --ignore-turn-restrictions --min-size-polygon=12 > >>> --description=openmtbmap_at --show-profiles=1 > >>> --location-autofill=bounds,is_in,nearest > >>> --bounds=c:\openmtbmap\maps\bounds --route --country-abbr=at > >>> --country-name=austria --mapname=63650000 --family-id=6365 > >>> --product-id=1 --series-name=openmtbmap_austria_06.05.2013 > >>> --family-name=mtbmap_at_06.05.2013 --tdbfile --overview-mapname=mapsetc > >>> --keep-going --area-name="austria_06.05.2013_openmtbmap.org" -c > >>> c:\openmtbmap\maps\template.austria > >>> > >>> On 06.05.2013 15:01, GerdP wrote: > >>>> Hi Felix, > >>>> > >>>> it's ant clean, not clear. > >>>> > >>>> reg. the error message: I have to find a way to handle this. The > >>>> program > >>>> wants either all files with an *_ovm.img or none, and all *_ovm.img > >>>> should > >>>> have the same levels, else this error is triggered. > >>>> The problem is that the overview builder doesn't know the style > >>>> that was > >>>> used to create the *.img files, > >>>> esp. not if multiple styles were used. So I decided to read the levels > >>>> from > >>>> the first *_ovm.img file > >>>> and use it for the overview map. This doesn't work if not all files > >>>> come > >>>> with a *_ovm.img > >>>> > >>>> Gerd > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Felix Hartmann-2 wrote > >>>>> and the resulting overview map, is completly empty... > >>>>> could this be related to using besides the OSM as input, also adding > >>>>> contourlines precompiled? > >>>>> On 06.05.2013 14:39, Felix Hartmann wrote: > >>>>>> ups yes, I had a typo and did ant clear - which doesn#t exist in my > >>>>>> build file -- however I run into the following problem: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> SEVERE (OverviewMapDataSource): invalid attempt to change map levels > >>>>>> > >>>>>> using the following "options" file: > >>>>>> levels = 0:24, 1:22, 2:21, 3:20, 4:19, 5:18 > >>>>>> overview-levels = 6:17, 7:16, 8:14 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On 06.05.2013 14:10, GerdP wrote: > >>>>>>> Hi Felix, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> did you compile from source? If yes, please try ant clean first. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Gerd > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Felix Hartmann-2 wrote > >>>>>>>> for a conservative approach - yes. Though I think adding > >>>>>>>> resolution > >>>>>>>> 17 > >>>>>>>> to the overview map, would be quite good (don't know if for > >>>>>>>> Asia or > >>>>>>>> Europe continent maps however, the overview map would become > >>>>>>>> too big > >>>>>>>> and > >>>>>>>> fail to compile). > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On 06.05.2013 13:53, GerdP wrote: > >>>>>>>>> Hi Felix, > >>>>>>>>> so you suggest this? > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> levels = 0:24, 1:22, 2:20, 3:18 > >>>>>>>>> overview-levels = 4:16, 5:14 > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Gerd > >>>>>>>> BTW - I have a problem with the overview branch - and my style > >>>>>>>> (didn't > >>>>>>>> try default one yet): > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: > >>>>>>>> uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.build.LocatorUtil.getNameTags(Luk/me/parabola/util/EnhancedProperties;)Ljava/util/List; > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>> uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.reader.osm.LinkDestinationHook.init(LinkDestinationHook.java:64) > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>> uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.reader.osm.OsmMapDataSource.pluginChain(OsmMapDataSource.java:182) > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>> uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.reader.osm.OsmMapDataSource.setupHandler(OsmMapDataSource.java:150) > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>> uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.reader.osm.bin.OsmBinMapDataSource.load(OsmBinMapDataSource.java:49) > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>> uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.reader.osm.OsmMapDataSource.load(OsmMapDataSource.java:124) > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>> uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.main.MapMaker.loadFromFile(MapMaker.java:155) > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>> uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.main.MapMaker.makeMap(MapMaker.java:57) > >>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>> uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.main.Main$1.call(Main.java:234) > >>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>> uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.main.Main$1.call(Main.java:231) > >>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>> java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(Unknown > >>>>>>>> Source) > >>>>>>>> at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(Unknown Source) > >>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(Unknown > >>>>>>>> Source) > >>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(Unknown > >>>>>>>> Source) > >>>>>>>> at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source) > >>>>>>>> Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: > >>>>>>>> uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.build.LocatorUtil.getNameTags(Luk/me/parabola/util/EnhancedProperties;)Ljava/util/List; > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> at uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.build.Locator. > >>>>>>>> > >>> <init> > >>>>>>>> (Locator.java:51) > >>>>>>>> at uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.build.Locator. > >>>>>>>> > >>> <init> > >>>>>>>> (Locator.java:47) > >>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>> uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.build.MapBuilder. > >>>>>>>> > >>> <init> > >>>>>>>> (MapBuilder.java:146) > >>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>> uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.combiners.OverviewBuilder.writeOverviewMap(OverviewBuilder.java:91) > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>> uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.combiners.OverviewBuilder.onFinish(OverviewBuilder.java:84) > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>> uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.main.Main.endOptions(Main.java:536) > >>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>> uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.CommandArgsReader.readArgs(CommandArgsReader.java:128) > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> at uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.main.Main.main(Main.java:119) > >>>>>>>>> Felix Hartmann-2 wrote > >>>>>>>>>> oh, and I would suppose a "," comma is missing too! > >>>>>>>>>> On 06.05.2013 13:46, GerdP wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Felix, > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> yes, it was a typo. I tested with different values. I have no > >>>>>>>>>>> preference > >>>>>>>>>>> and > >>>>>>>>>>> no experience, > >>>>>>>>>>> so I'd be happy to hear proposals. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Gerd > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Felix Hartmann-2 wrote > >>>>>>>>>>>> Is there a typo in the options file? > >>>>>>>>>>>> "overview-levels = 5:16 6:18" > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> shouldn't that be 5:16 6:14 ??? > >>>>>>>>>>>> I think that if the numbering continues, further levels > >>>>>>>>>>>> should be > >>>>>>>>>>>> decreasing resolution. So if 18 and 16 should be used in the > >>>>>>>>>>>> overview > >>>>>>>>>>>> map (but why have 17 then as normal map resolution??): > >>>>>>>>>>>> it should read "5:18 6:16" -- However I thought overlapping > >>>>>>>>>>>> resolutions > >>>>>>>>>>>> is not good form (actually dunno what happens). > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> IMHO 5:16 6:14 is quite good as conservative value. (continent > >>>>>>>>>>>> maps). > >>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe we should even move to 4:17 5:16 6:14 in the overview > >>>>>>>>>>>> map > >>>>>>>>>>>> (and > >>>>>>>>>>>> 0-3 > >>>>>>>>>>>> in the normal map)... > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> As for the routable basemap on newer garmin GPS. Maybe we > >>>>>>>>>>>> could > >>>>>>>>>>>> create > >>>>>>>>>>>> a > >>>>>>>>>>>> non routable mkgmap created basemap and recommend people to > >>>>>>>>>>>> use > >>>>>>>>>>>> it > >>>>>>>>>>>> instead? > >>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>>>>>>>>> mkgmap-dev mailing list > >>>>>>>>>>>> mkgmap-dev at .org > >>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev > >>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>>> View this message in context: > >>>>>>>>>>> http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Overview2-branch-options-file-typo-tp5759855p5759856.html > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at > >>>>>>>>>>> Nabble.com. > >>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>>>>>>>> mkgmap-dev mailing list > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> mkgmap-dev at .org > >>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev > >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>>>>>>> mkgmap-dev mailing list > >>>>>>>>>> mkgmap-dev at .org > >>>>>>>>>> http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>> View this message in context: > >>>>>>>>> http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Overview2-branch-options-file-typo-tp5759855p5759858.html > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at > >>>>>>>>> Nabble.com. > >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>>>>>> mkgmap-dev mailing list > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> mkgmap-dev at .org > >>>>>>>>> http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev > >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>>>>> mkgmap-dev mailing list > >>>>>>>> mkgmap-dev at .org > >>>>>>>> http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>> View this message in context: > >>>>>>> http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Overview2-branch-options-file-typo-tp5759855p5759861.html > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at > >>>>>>> Nabble.com. > >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>>>> mkgmap-dev mailing list > >>>>>>> > >>>>> mkgmap-dev at .org > >>>>>>> http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev > >>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>> mkgmap-dev mailing list > >>>>> mkgmap-dev at .org > >>>>> http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> View this message in context: > >>>> http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Overview2-branch-options-file-typo-tp5759855p5759868.html > >>>> > >>>> Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> mkgmap-dev mailing list > >>>> > >>> mkgmap-dev at .org > >>>> http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> mkgmap-dev mailing list > >>> mkgmap-dev at .org > >>> http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> View this message in context: > >> http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Overview2-branch-options-file-typo-tp5759855p5759878.html > >> Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >> _______________________________________________ > >> mkgmap-dev mailing list > >> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk > >> http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk > http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20130506/9e947ea7/attachment-0001.html
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] Overview2 branch - options file typo?
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] Overview2 branch - options file typo?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list