[mkgmap-dev] more refined mkgmap:skipSizeFilter=true handling
From GerdP gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com on Wed May 15 09:24:46 BST 2013
forgot to mention that it is r2609 in the overview2 branch. Gerd GerdP wrote > Hi, > > I've committed r2609 that implements new option polygon-size-limits. > It turned out to be rather complicated to use the levels value, so I > decided to > use the resolution. > > If given and syntactically correct, the option overrides the value for > min-size-polygon. > > I hope that helps... > I do now try to find a solution for the small sea/land polygons. > > Gerd > > --polygon-size-limits=limits code > Allows to specify different min-size-polygon values for each resolution. > Sample: > --polygon-size-limits="24:12, 18:10, 16:8, 14:4, 12:2, 10:0" > If a resolution is not given, mkgmap uses the value for the next higher > one. For the given sample, resolutions 19 to 24 will use value 12, > resolution 17 and 18 will use 10, and so on. > Value 0 means to skip the size filter. > Note that in resolution 24 the filter is not used. > > > Felix Hartmann-2 wrote >> for me not (I only need it for sea anyhow). but the current >> implementation is to have the mkgmap:skipSizeFilter=true to be added to >> the style-file. min-size-polygon="0:12, 1:12, 3:12, 4:12, 5:10, 6:8, >> 7:8, 8:4, 9:2, 10:1" or similar was my original request for this... >> >> On 14.05.2013 17:47, Henning Scholland wrote: >>> But this should be handled in options. Like: >>> >>> min-size-polygon="0:12, 1:12, 3:12, 4:12, 5:10, 6:8, 7:8, 8:4, 9:2, >>> 10:1" >>> >>> Or is it necessary to handle it different for different polygon types? >>> >>> Henning >>> >>> Am 14.05.2013 23:25, schrieb Felix Hartmann: >>>> b) A more optimal solution would be the following: >>>> mkgmap:changeSizeFilter="level:filter_strenght" so e.g. "0:12, 1:12, >>>> 3:12, 4:12, 5:10, 6:8, 7:8, 8:4, 9:2, 10:1" >>>> A filter working this way, would have great impact on the overview.img >>>> size, as well as normal map.img size - without leading to strong visual >>>> impact. (up to 50% saving on the overview.img size) >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> mkgmap-dev mailing list >> mkgmap-dev at .org >> http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/more-refined-mkgmap-skipSizeFilter-true-handling-tp5761046p5761087.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] more refined mkgmap:skipSizeFilter=true handling
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] more refined mkgmap:skipSizeFilter=true handling
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list