logo separator

[mkgmap-dev] Drive-on-left

From Steve Ratcliffe steve at parabola.me.uk on Tue Aug 13 09:50:17 BST 2013

Hi

> live with that very easily, but I wonder if the final value of that
> "implication" could be propagated to the TRE header somehow, so it is
> simpler to document and understand?

The way that the implied value is transmitted to the NOD header does
not work in the case that you have max-jobs greater than one and
you are compiling files with differing left/right sides. So I am not
keen to extend that any further.

> Any idea if the "base map" vs. "detail map" flag (0x01) is important? I

It can't be that important, given that have survived this long without 
it. But I think we should set it. Could you let me know which byte
in the header it is or create a patch.

> noticed that the maps produced by mkgmap are "base maps" whereas
> Garmin's own maps are "detail maps". Similarly with the
> "background=water" vs "background=land" (0x10) which ImgTool also reveals.

I don't know anything about this one. It sounds like it might be 
important though.

..Steve


More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list