[mkgmap-dev] Drive-on-left
From Steve Ratcliffe steve at parabola.me.uk on Tue Aug 13 09:50:17 BST 2013
Hi > live with that very easily, but I wonder if the final value of that > "implication" could be propagated to the TRE header somehow, so it is > simpler to document and understand? The way that the implied value is transmitted to the NOD header does not work in the case that you have max-jobs greater than one and you are compiling files with differing left/right sides. So I am not keen to extend that any further. > Any idea if the "base map" vs. "detail map" flag (0x01) is important? I It can't be that important, given that have survived this long without it. But I think we should set it. Could you let me know which byte in the header it is or create a patch. > noticed that the maps produced by mkgmap are "base maps" whereas > Garmin's own maps are "detail maps". Similarly with the > "background=water" vs "background=land" (0x10) which ImgTool also reveals. I don't know anything about this one. It sounds like it might be important though. ..Steve
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] Drive-on-left
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] Drive-on-left
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list