logo separator

[mkgmap-dev] Possible solution for deformed polygons

From GerdP gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com on Sat Nov 23 16:30:30 GMT 2013

Hi,

yes, I plan to implement it at the same place were lines are merged, that
means,
one merge for each sub division. Question is whether I find a way to do it
without 
complex calculations, else it will slow down processing too much.

Gerd


Henning Scholland wrote
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Hi Gerd,
> if this merging is done after style-processing, then it should be a
> great improvement without complications. Otherwise only polygons
> should be merged if all tags are equal.
> 
> Henning
> 
> Am 23.11.2013 16:25, schrieb GerdP:
>> Hi Andrzej,
>> 
>> for address search the data is saved with the roads, not with the
>> polygons and poi are separate points, so I don't see a problem
>> here. I did not yet start coding, as I still try to find a better
>> algo for the bad angles in roads.
>> 
>> Gerd
>> 
>> 
>> popej wrote
>>> Hi Gerd,
>>> 
>>>> 1) merge polygons with equal types etc. like in merge-lines
>>>> algo, so that e.g. buildings that share walls are combined to
>>>> one polygon > (without creating holes).
>>> 
>>> I would expect that many buildings have address tag which would
>>> make merging not advisable.
>>> 
>>> How merging would cooperate with option add-pois-to-areas?
>>> 
>>> -- Best regards, Andrzej 
>>> _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev
>>> mailing list
>> 
>>> mkgmap-dev at .org
>> 
>>> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- View this message in context:
>> http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Possible-solution-for-deformed-polygons-tp5786064p5786952.html
>>
>> 
> Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing
>> list 

> mkgmap-dev at .org

>  
>> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSkNa2AAoJEPFgsWC7jOeTG+EIALR1DG4mMeJ1996r8ZMJJJxX
> qb8r0vN5E67Iai4bURr4za2G2BGCVaukvdvjEA78V3SwTakcDGXOc/Y+oCiXgp6j
> dcWLE/tdeP9bsd8dM8WI9jOsoIvXZOzpun5q8H+HbWZbj5xZOVGJooDMJCNb5Gi7
> L42NyLOobR1eVUztwdl4AoVrXok69UI18I5+gQKv0RacOcVvPWGPEjzxclHHDiqH
> 1wmJruf26VaEtXpZGGpAN0Shbzx3Vex/G8B+EX8dqOI7iN83SqBLQMBL0zXu5QWs
> WxBJrZX3He5uw6AlliA9sg3p8mxAfK2XElp09Rd7ZgfqNApNQmp7WfTWFwWhUjY=
> =TfIG
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list

> mkgmap-dev at .org

> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev





--
View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Possible-solution-for-deformed-polygons-tp5786064p5786968.html
Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list