[mkgmap-dev] Possible solution for deformed polygons
From GerdP gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com on Sat Nov 23 16:30:30 GMT 2013
Hi, yes, I plan to implement it at the same place were lines are merged, that means, one merge for each sub division. Question is whether I find a way to do it without complex calculations, else it will slow down processing too much. Gerd Henning Scholland wrote > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi Gerd, > if this merging is done after style-processing, then it should be a > great improvement without complications. Otherwise only polygons > should be merged if all tags are equal. > > Henning > > Am 23.11.2013 16:25, schrieb GerdP: >> Hi Andrzej, >> >> for address search the data is saved with the roads, not with the >> polygons and poi are separate points, so I don't see a problem >> here. I did not yet start coding, as I still try to find a better >> algo for the bad angles in roads. >> >> Gerd >> >> >> popej wrote >>> Hi Gerd, >>> >>>> 1) merge polygons with equal types etc. like in merge-lines >>>> algo, so that e.g. buildings that share walls are combined to >>>> one polygon > (without creating holes). >>> >>> I would expect that many buildings have address tag which would >>> make merging not advisable. >>> >>> How merging would cooperate with option add-pois-to-areas? >>> >>> -- Best regards, Andrzej >>> _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev >>> mailing list >> >>> mkgmap-dev at .org >> >>> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev >> >> >> >> >> >> -- View this message in context: >> http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Possible-solution-for-deformed-polygons-tp5786064p5786952.html >> >> > Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing >> list > mkgmap-dev at .org > >> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev >> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux) > > iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSkNa2AAoJEPFgsWC7jOeTG+EIALR1DG4mMeJ1996r8ZMJJJxX > qb8r0vN5E67Iai4bURr4za2G2BGCVaukvdvjEA78V3SwTakcDGXOc/Y+oCiXgp6j > dcWLE/tdeP9bsd8dM8WI9jOsoIvXZOzpun5q8H+HbWZbj5xZOVGJooDMJCNb5Gi7 > L42NyLOobR1eVUztwdl4AoVrXok69UI18I5+gQKv0RacOcVvPWGPEjzxclHHDiqH > 1wmJruf26VaEtXpZGGpAN0Shbzx3Vex/G8B+EX8dqOI7iN83SqBLQMBL0zXu5QWs > WxBJrZX3He5uw6AlliA9sg3p8mxAfK2XElp09Rd7ZgfqNApNQmp7WfTWFwWhUjY= > =TfIG > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > mkgmap-dev at .org > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Possible-solution-for-deformed-polygons-tp5786064p5786968.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] Possible solution for deformed polygons
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] Possible solution for deformed polygons
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list