[mkgmap-dev] Questions about carpool handling
From WanMil wmgcnfg at web.de on Wed Dec 4 21:09:49 GMT 2013
Hi, I am still very irritated about the meaning of the carpool bit of every road. The handling in the trunk is not consistent. It is handled in the following way and order: access=yes/1/true => carpool bit is cleared access=no/private => carpool bit is set carpool=yes/1/true => carpool bit is cleared carpool=no/private => carpool bit is set mkgmap:carpool=yes/1/true => carpool bit is cleared (emergency and bus is also cleared, all other bits are set) Some examples: highway=primary;access=yes the carpool bit is not set highway=primary the carpool bit is set highway=primary;carpool=yes the carpool bit is not set highway=path;access=no;foot=yes the carpool bit is set highway=secondary;mkgmap:carpool=yes the carpool bit is not set Can anybody explain how the carpool bit works? And how mkgmap should handle this bit? It should be handled correctly in the mergeroads branch. I found some threads which did not give the complete solution for me: http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/2009q4/005873.html http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/2010q1/006277.html http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/2011q4/012919.html Also a lot of threads complaining about non reliable carpool handling. I think above examples are a good explanation for this. WanMil
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] Way.isClosed()
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] Questions about carpool handling
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list