logo separator

[mkgmap-dev] invalid types in check-styles

From GerdP gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com on Thu Jan 2 22:00:28 GMT 2014 

Hi all,

got no answer on the question what mkgmap should 
do with a type like 0x11f in the lines file.
The current behaviour is that it quietly ignores 
the error because it treats 0x11f like 0x1f.
I'd prefer to write an error message and 
completely ignore the corresponding line in the style.

Gerd 


nwillink wrote
> Hi Gerd
> 
> No , its only the style checker that throws up the anomaly.
> 
> I might have missed something about mkgmap requiring 00 subtypes ? 
> although I have not encountered
> any problems leaving them out for extended types
> 
> The highest subtype is 1F and the highest type for lines/polylines, I 
> think, &1FF making 1FF1F the  highest number.
> 
> 
> On 30/12/2013 17:17, GerdP [via GIS] wrote:
>> Hi Nick,
>>
>> well, 0x11f00 is 256 * 0x11f, so it is not the same, but
>> if I get you right you want mkgmap to interpret all values >= 0x100 and x
>> as if they were written with a 00 at the end.
>> What is the upper bound (x) ?
>>
>> See also
>> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/2013q2/017797.html
>>
>> Gerd
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 08:04:31 -0800
>> From: [hidden email]
>> </user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5791215&i=0>
>> To: [hidden email]
>> </user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5791215&i=1>
>> Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] invalid types in check-styles
>>
>> Hi Gerd
>>
>> 0x11f is the same as 0x11f00 - both have been valid expressions in the 
>> past.
>>
>> However, the style checker tells me that 11f is invalid.
>> This applies to I think all extended types , ie it tells me 10A 
>> (without the 00) is invalid.
>> It accepts 10A00 but not 10A
>> It accepts 11F00 but not 11F
>> I agree 10A00 is the more accurate way of defining an extended line 
>> but it might be confusing to flag them as invalid.
>>
>> r
>>
>> Nick
>>
>>
>> On 30/12/2013 15:49, GerdP [via GIS] wrote:
>>
>>     Hi,
>>
>>     yes, 0x11f00 is recognized as an extended type.
>>     What bug do you mean?
>>     Should mkgmap interpret 0x11f as 0x11f00
>>     when used in the lines or polygons file?
>>
>>     Gerd
>>
>>     > Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 02:07:24 -0800
>>
>>     > From: [hidden email]
>>     <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5791203&i=0>
>>     > To: [hidden email]
>>     <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5791203&i=1>
>>     > Subject: [mkgmap-dev] invalid types in check-styles
>>     >
>>     > Hi
>>     >
>>     > Interesting 'bug' when using check-styles.
>>     >
>>     > It had me foxed as it actually by chance highlighted lines I
>>     didn't use in
>>     > my TYP file.
>>     >
>>     > invalid type 0x11f for POLYLINE
>>     >
>>     > It transpires that when replacing 11f with 11f00 the type number is
>>     > correctly identified as valid.
>>     > I checked it with several lines, with and without the zero
>> subtypes.
>>     >
>>     >
>>     >
>>     >
>>     >
>>     > --
>>     > View this message in context:
>>    
>> http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/invalid-types-in-check-styles-tp5791157.html
>>     > Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at
>> Nabble.com.
>>     > _______________________________________________
>>     > mkgmap-dev mailing list
>>     > [hidden email]
>>     <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5791203&i=2>
>>     > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     mkgmap-dev mailing list
>>     [hidden email]
>>     <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5791203&i=3>
>>     http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>>
>>    
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>     If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
>>     discussion below:
>>    
>> http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/invalid-types-in-check-styles-tp5791157p5791203.html
>>
>>     To unsubscribe from invalid types in check-styles, click here
>>     <http://>.
>>     NAML
>>    
>> <http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble:email.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble:email.naml-instant_emails%21nabble:email.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble:email.naml>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> View this message in context: Re: invalid types in check-styles 
>> <http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/invalid-types-in-check-styles-tp5791157p5791212.html>
>> Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive 
>> <http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Mkgmap-Development-f5324443.html>
>> at 
>> Nabble.com.
>>
>> _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing 
>> list [hidden email]
>> </user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5791215&i=2> 
>> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> </user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5791215&i=3>
>> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the 
>> discussion below:
>> http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/invalid-types-in-check-styles-tp5791157p5791215.html 
>>
>> To unsubscribe from invalid types in check-styles, click here 
>> <http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=5791157&code=b3NtQHBpbm5zLmNvLnVrfDU3OTExNTd8MTM1NTM3MTE1MQ==>.
>> NAML 
>> <http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml> 
>>





--
View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/invalid-types-in-check-styles-tp5791157p5791513.html
Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list