[mkgmap-dev] Bug: Address search and opposite cycleway
From Thorsten Kukuk kukuk at suse.de on Sun Mar 9 18:49:05 GMT 2014
Hi, On Sun, Mar 09, WanMil wrote: > Hi Thorsten, > >> >> Hi, >> >> I was wondering why I couldn't find sometimes addresses even >> if they where entered correct in OSM. >> By pure luck I found now the reason, it looks like if a way >> has the tag "cycleway=opposite", the address information is >> put on the wrong way. >> >> Look at Sandwall 17 or 19 in Wyk auf Foehr >> (http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/54.68666/8.56960) >> >> With my own and with the default mkgmap style, you will not find >> the address with "Sandwall 17", but with "Sandwall (Cycleway) 17". >> >> I think for address search, the "(Cylceway)" streets should be ignored. > > it's up to you to ignore the cycleway: > matching of nodes/polygons with house numbers are performed by evaluating > the mkgmap:street tag of the road. So you can exclude all cycleways by > removing or not setting the mkgmap:street tag on them. Hm, how does this work then? My understanding was, that you take the addr:street tag and compare them with the road name. But "Sandwall (Cycleway)" is for me not identical to "Sandwall" as written in addr:street? Else how can I detect, that a way is the original one ("Sandwall") and not the cloned one for the opposite cycleway ("Sandwall (Cycleway)")? Thanks, thorsten -- Thorsten Kukuk, Senior Architect SLES & Common Code Base SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409 Nuernberg GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] Bug: Address search and opposite cycleway
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] Bug: Address search and opposite cycleway
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list