[mkgmap-dev] Turn restrictions with role=via ways
From Gerd Petermann gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com on Mon Mar 17 10:02:01 GMT 2014
Hi Marko, I'll have a look at it. Gerd > Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 00:03:43 +0200 > From: marko.makela at iki.fi > To: mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk > Subject: [mkgmap-dev] Turn restrictions with role=via ways > > Now, with all these routing improvements, I wonder if it would be > possible to extend our support for turn restrictions. > > Some mapper seems to prefer via ways to via nodes in this crossing: > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30692839 > > This 2-node way is a role=via member of a no_u_turn restriction that has > 4 ways as members: from,via,via,to. It is also a role=via member of a > no_left_turn restriction. > > The no_u_turn restriction could have been mapped with three ways as > from,via,to and the no_left_turn could have been mapped with having this > way as role=from, and a node as role=via. Even if I changed the map like > that, mkgmap would still ignore the no_u_turn, because the role=via > member would be a way. > > So, I wonder if we could start supporting this style of mapping? There > are lots of dual carriageways in city areas where such turn restrictions > are common, at least for no_u_turn. > > Marko > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20140317/bcf5397a/attachment.html>
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] Turn restrictions with role=via ways
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] Turn restrictions with role=via ways
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list