[mkgmap-dev] ontario canada maps

Sun Mar 23 00:31:23 GMT 2014

have you had any success GERD P , on the size of the poi with the  ontario
poi files

and i see also , that the poi file list , has removed all the fast food
chains

stephen

On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 11:29 PM, Gerd Petermann <
gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Stephen,
>
> please post a link to your style files, so that we can
> reproduce the problem.
>
> Gerd
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 22:43:12 +1000
> From: steve.sgalowski at gmail.com
> To: mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] ontario canada maps
>
> now i get point file to big
>
> max nodes = 160,000
>
> any ideas ?
>
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 8:27 PM, Steve Sgalowski <steve.sgalowski at gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
> i was thinking ,
> maybe if i download another pre compiled map of the area
> then used gmap tool to de compile into a typ file
>
> do you think this could partly solve my prob ?
>
> stephen
>
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 7:26 PM, Gerd Petermann <
> gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Stephen,
>
> I guess it is something special in your style, I can't reproduce the
> problem with the default style.
>
> The values 90.000 / 160.000 are extreme small, so the problem seems to be
> that a very small
> area contains a large number of POI. I saw a similar problem a few weeks
> ago with a
> style that assigned POI to zip codes and buildings which contained
> hundrets of PO-boxes with different
> zip codes.
>
> Gerd
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2014 19:21:50 +1000
> From: steve.sgalowski at gmail.com
> To: mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] ontario canada maps
>
> due to the number of points in the map
>
> however , i have not had many issues with the other maps i create
>
> with the same program
> i have r3072 , and splitter 317 installed
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 7:18 PM, Gerd Petermann <
> gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Steve,
>
> you used 90.000, why do you think that 160.000 will help?
>
> Gerd
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2014 19:13:46 +1000
> From: steve.sgalowski at gmail.com
> To: mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] ontario canada maps
>
> running it now with 160,000 nodes
> and here is the basic args file
>
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 7:07 PM, Gerd Petermann <
> gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Stephen,
>
> sorry, forget my last post, order of args doesn't seem to matter in
> splitter.
> I was not able to reproduce the problem with the default style, mkgmap
> r3072 (trunk) and splitter r317.
> I used max-nodes=1600000 and see no problem.
>
> So, please make sure that you use the latest versions of the programs
> and if that doesn't help, please send more details regarding the content
> of ..\bin\template_basic.args
>
> Gerd
>
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2014 18:28:21 +1000
> From: steve.sgalowski at gmail.com
> To: mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] ontario canada maps
>
> here is the batch file i use
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 6:16 PM, Gerd Petermann <
> gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Stephen,
>
> is the OSM file the only input? Or do you mix it with something else?
>
> Gerd
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2014 18:13:03 +1000
> From: steve.sgalowski at gmail.com
> To: mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> Subject: [mkgmap-dev] ontario canada maps
>
> while the splitter worked ok
> the compiler has spat the dummy
>
> error msg is this
>
> area  to small to split reduce point number
> then i get , (  point number to big)
>
> --max-areas - 100
> --max-nodes = 90000
>
> any ideas?
>
> stephen
>
>
> _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20140323/32f0a5c0/attachment.html>