[mkgmap-dev] question regarding MapRoad
From Gerd Petermann gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com on Tue Mar 25 16:05:05 GMT 2014
Hi Andrzej, > Do you still consider this idea? > > I have experimenting a bit with MAX_DIVISION_SIZE in mkgmap. I have > observed increase in file size, when using small value, but no increase > in processing speed. I think this discussion gives some explanations. As > I understand, mkgmap doesn't split map objects to fit subdivisions. So > there is no gain from using smaller subdivisions, because there is no > reduction in processed objects size. Tried the same with the same result some time ago. > > I would expect that proper truncating objects to subdivisions could be > another big improvement for mkgmap. Please, don't abandon this idea. I agree, but it requires a redesign of the MapSplit algo, which is complex. I don't want to start complex changes before autumn, but if anybody else wants to start, that would be great. Gerd -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20140325/e44b83b8/attachment.html>
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] question regarding MapRoad
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] style problem
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list