[mkgmap-dev] vehicles in restriction relations

Sun Mar 30 12:34:28 BST 2014

Hi Gerd,

do you have an idea how to set that in the style?

I think "goods" should not be mapped to delivery. This might also be 
changed in the default style access rules. The wiki tells about goods: 
light commercial vehicles; e.g., goods vehicles with a maximum allowed 
mass of up to 3.5 tonnes
So it should better be mapped to truck?

WanMil

> Hi all,
>
> I've just modified a routine that translates the vehicle types used
> in OSM to the ones used in Garmin restrictions:
> 		if(vehicle.equals("motorcar") || vehicle.equals("motorcycle") ||
> vehicle.equals("motor_vehicle"))
> 			flag = RouteRestriction.EXCEPT_CAR;
> 		else if(vehicle.equals("psv") || vehicle.equals("bus"))
> 			flag = RouteRestriction.EXCEPT_BUS;
> 		else if(vehicle.equals("taxi"))
> 			flag = RouteRestriction.EXCEPT_TAXI;
> 		else if(vehicle.equals("delivery") || vehicle.equals("goods"))
> 			flag = RouteRestriction.EXCEPT_DELIVERY;
> 		else if(vehicle.equals("bicycle"))
> 			flag = RouteRestriction.EXCEPT_BICYCLE;
> 		else if(vehicle.equals("hgv") || vehicle.equals("truck"))
> 			flag = RouteRestriction.EXCEPT_TRUCK;
> 		if (flag == 0){
> 			log.warn(messagePrefix, "ignoring unsupported vehicle class '" + vehicle
> + "' in turn restriction");
> 			return false;
> 		} else { ...}
>
> I think that this should better be done in the style?
>
> I also wonder why the wiki lists different kinds of vehicles for
> restriction:<vehicle>=<turn> , type=restriction:<vehicle> , and except=*
> I hope it is okay to use the same code for all of them?
>
> Gerd
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/vehicles-in-restriction-relations-tp5801618.html
> Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>