[mkgmap-dev] Building vs way in default style
From GerdP gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com on Mon May 5 20:58:58 BST 2014
Hi Steph, I think mkgmap creates a shape for the building and another one for the water. It seems that without a type file the water has higher priority. It is possible to detect that situation and cut the shape of the building out of the shape for the water, but that will require a lot of CPU, so I think it's not a good idea. Gerd Stéphane MARTIN wrote > Hi all, > > I don't know if it's an issue... > A map compiled with the default style gives a not very nice rendering > for "Barrage Vauban" in Strasbourg (identifier 40 217 747 in OSM). > > https://tuxdomain.darktech.org/osm-garmin/view.php?file=France/Barrage_Vauban.osm > > Building is not rendered. Just the way. > And there are bits of building on the banks. > > Priority problem in the style ? > > NB : building isn't correctly tagged (building=bridge would be a better > tag). > > Steph > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > mkgmap-dev at .org > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Building-vs-way-in-default-style-tp5805279p5805282.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] Building vs way in default style
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] Building vs way in default style
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list