[mkgmap-dev] Commit: r3259: remove most checks regarding routable/non-routable types.

Wed May 7 18:47:55 BST 2014

Hi

The house numbers are in NET. We would have to ensure there was no pointer into NOD (which is an optional part of the NET record) and that nothing else tried to reference that road.

..Steve

GerdP <gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com> wrote:
>Hi Andrzej,
>
>current implementation applies housenumbers to routable ways only.
>If I got that right, garmin format would allow to have non-routable
>ways
>with
>housenumber info, but that would be stored in NOD as well.
>
>Gerd
>
>
>popej wrote
>> Hi,
>> 
>> what about address search and house numbers? I have some some
>specific 
>> questions:
>> 
>> Which types of lines can be used for address search?
>> 
>> Which types do get house numbers? I understand that house numbers
>from 
>> points are transfered to a lines, but does it depend on line type or 
>> object tagging, other then addr:*?
>> 
>> Can I use non-routable line for address search?
>> 
>> -- 
>> Best regards,
>> Andrzej
>> _______________________________________________
>> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>
>> mkgmap-dev at .org
>
>> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>
>
>
>
>
>--
>View this message in context:
>http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Commit-r3259-remove-most-checks-regarding-routable-non-routable-types-tp5805376p5805528.html
>Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>_______________________________________________
>mkgmap-dev mailing list
>mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
>http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20140507/d53580d2/attachment.html>