[mkgmap-dev] Commit: r3259: remove most checks regarding routable/non-routable types.
From Gerd Petermann gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com on Sun May 11 09:37:33 BST 2014
Hi Minko, that sounds like the original list was not so bad: //return type >= 0x01 && type <= 0x13 || type == 0x1a || type == 0x1b || type == 0x16; what about 0x16, 0x1a and 0x1b ? 0xa is in the range 0x01 - 0x13. Is this really an exception? And is it the only one? Gerd > Date: Sun, 11 May 2014 10:29:21 +0200 > From: ligfietser at online.nl > To: mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk > Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Commit: r3259: remove most checks regarding routable/non-routable types. > > Hi Gerd > > > If I got that right, we should > > 1) warn when the style file lines uses types 0x02 - 0x09 without road > > class/speed if -check-styles is used > > > > 2) warn if a line is added multiple times, once with type between 0x01 > > and 0x3f and road class/speed, > > once with type 0x02 - 0x09 and without road class/speed. > > > > I've implemented that with r3267. > > > > Gerd > > > I also found errors with 0x01, 0x10, 0x13 but not 0x18 or 0xa > > So better warn with 0x01-0x13;0x16 without road class/speed > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20140511/f0926ee5/attachment.html>
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] Commit: r3259: remove most checks regarding routable/non-routable types.
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] Commit: r3259: remove most checks regarding routable/non-routable types.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list