[mkgmap-dev] Commit: r3259: remove most checks regarding routable/non-routable types.

Sun May 11 10:27:09 BST 2014

Hi Minko
what about 0xa ? Or was that meant to be 0x1a ?

Gerd

> Date: Sun, 11 May 2014 11:22:33 +0200
> From: ligfietser at online.nl
> To: mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Commit: r3259: remove most checks regarding routable/non-routable types.
> 
> 
> > that sounds like the original list was not so bad:
> > //return type >= 0x01 && type <= 0x13 || type == 0x1a || type == 0x1b
> > || type == 0x16;
> > what about 0x16, 0x1a and 0x1b ?
> > 
> > 0xa is in the range 0x01 - 0x13. Is this really an exception? And is
> > it the only one?
> 
> Hi Gerd
> 
> 0x16: routing error
> 0x1a: no routing error (double checked this)
> 0x1b: routing error
> 
> So it's weird that only 0x1a shows no routing error.
> Better keep the original list then to be safe?
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20140511/f9b70ec7/attachment.html>