[mkgmap-dev] Commit: r3259: remove most checks regarding routable/non-routable types.

Sun May 11 11:22:50 BST 2014

As there are clearly differences in features supported by various
models, would it maybe be an idea to externalise the differences in some
way? How about a file to contain the capabilities of device types, an
option to target a particular entry in that file, and a way to expose
the selected device in the style files? That could also help address the
differences in supported POI categories and icons. 

Colin 

On 2014-05-11 11:52, Gerd Petermann wrote: 

> Hi Minko,
> 
> thanks for your help. This is now implemented with r3269.
> 
> Gerd
> 
>> Date: Sun, 11 May 2014 11:45:47 +0200
>> From: ligfietser at online.nl
>> To: mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
>> Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Commit: r3259: remove most checks regarding routable/non-routable types.
>> 
>>> what about 0xa ? Or was that meant to be 0x1a ?
>> 
>> Hi Gerd
>> 
>> 0x0a gives also a routing error, so everything in the range 
>> 0x01-0x13, 0x16 and 0x1b
>> _______________________________________________
>> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
>> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev [1]

Links:
------
[1] http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20140511/27df9c00/attachment.html>