[mkgmap-dev] Rendering Tunnels

Wed Oct 22 20:43:51 BST 2014

Gerd thanks for the comment - it's likely a bug in facs: I tried again with
same result,

# WORKING OK
enrico at gling:/opt/osm/test$ ls -l gmapsupp.img
-rw-rw-r-- 1 enrico enrico 87724032 ott 22 00:15 gmapsupp.img

#copied lines style file to lines_last adding "road_class=2 road_speed=3"
enrico at gling:/opt/osm/mystyle/r2946/default$ diff lines  lines_last
172c172
< highway=secondary  [0x04 road_class=2 road_speed=3 resolution 20-21
continue]
---
> highway=secondary  [0x04 resolution 20-21 continue]

# ROUTING IS BROKEN
enrico at gling:/opt/osm/test$ ls -l gmapsupp.img
-rw-rw-r-- 1 enrico enrico 88676352 ott 22 21:30 gmapsupp.img

note that the latter gmapsupp.img with broken routing is 1MB larger than
the working one, so it has clearly something more in it while it should not
if the routing graph is just the result of res 24 ways...

On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 8:37 AM, Gerd Petermann <
gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Enrico,
>
> I think this change should NOT have an influence on routing, so it would
> be an
> error in mkgmap if it does.
> Please double check this result.
>
> Gerd
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 23:33:31 +0200
> From: eliboni at gmail.com
> To: mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Rendering Tunnels
>
>
> Dzięki Andrzej! By removing  "road_class=2 road_speed=3" from the 2nd
> line, routing works and tunnels are visible - here is how it looks line:
>
> highway=secondary & ( network=e-road | int_ref=* ) [0x04 resolution 18-19
> continue]
> highway=secondary  [0x04 resolution 20-21 continue]
> highway=secondary & tunnel=yes [0x11 road_class=2 road_speed=3 resolution
> 22]
> highway=secondary  [0x04 road_class=2 road_speed=3 resolution 22]
>
> All looks fine now, and routable!
>
> Enrico
>
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Andrzej Popowski <popej at poczta.onet.pl>
> wrote:
>
> Hi Enrico,
>
> > I believe this was my intention: up to res 21 I'd like the line to
> > appear as 0x04, from resolution 22 it should appear as 0x11 if a
> > tunnel, otherwise 0x04 - no further processing is needed. Could you
> > pls let me know why the reasoning is not correct?
>
> This is correct. I have assumed that you'd like to get 2 lines for
> tunnels: standard road and additional marking for tunnel.
>
> As I understand, routing parameters are only valid for layer 24 (or the
> last layer in a map). I would remove road_class and road_speed from line:
> highway=secondary  [0x04 road_class=2 road_speed=3 resolution 20-21
> continue]
>
> Maybe this is the reason for routing errors?
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Andrzej
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20141022/4a84e0f0/attachment.html>