[mkgmap-dev] gmappsupp size with 20% bigger when using latest splitter

Thu Oct 23 08:19:23 BST 2014

ops - you must be right! thanks

On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Gerd Petermann <
gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Enrico,
>
> splitter r412 should produce fewer tiles, so one explanation might be that
> the last for
> tiles were not produced by r412. Since your listing shows different
> timestamps for them
> I'd say you did not start with a clean directory.
>
> Gerd
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 00:03:15 +0200
> From: eliboni at gmail.com
> To: mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> Subject: [mkgmap-dev] gmappsupp size with 20% bigger when using latest
> splitter
>
>
> I updated my splitter version from 314 to 412 - now, it's pretty late but
> I read about the new split algorithm that might cause some different sizes
> than before,  maybe I searched too quickly but I can't seem to explain why
> the final gmapsupp went from  87MB  to 107MB.
>
> Looking at the split output in 412 and 314, it's clear 412 creates bigger
> files. Strange enough the last 4 files have the same size...
>
> # splitter 412
>  10637241 oct 22 23:23 70600001.osm.pbf
>  12379309 oct 22 23:23 70600002.osm.pbf
>  12233125 oct 22 23:23 70600003.osm.pbf
>  12607475 oct 22 23:23 70600004.osm.pbf
>  14031652 oct 22 23:23 70600005.osm.pbf
>  12025643 oct 22 23:23 70600006.osm.pbf
>   9286836 oct 22 23:23 70600007.osm.pbf
>  11071432 oct 22 23:23 70600008.osm.pbf
>  11720495 oct 22 23:23 70600009.osm.pbf
>  11909440 oct 22 23:23 70600010.osm.pbf
>  12356777 oct 22 23:23 70600011.osm.pbf
>  11513810 oct 22 23:23 70600012.osm.pbf
>  11672847 oct 22 23:23 70600013.osm.pbf
>  11988497 oct 22 23:23 70600014.osm.pbf
>
>
>
> *  9209424 oct 22 22:28 70600015.osm.pbf 11793063 oct 22 22:28
> 70600016.osm.pbf 10161776 oct 22 22:28 70600017.osm.pbf 10080071 oct 22
> 22:28 70600018.osm.pbf*
>
> # splitter 314
>   7323072 oct 22 23:43 70600001.osm.pbf
>   8832797 oct 22 23:43 70600002.osm.pbf
>   9987720 oct 22 23:43 70600003.osm.pbf
>   8862868 oct 22 23:43 70600004.osm.pbf
>   7198648 oct 22 23:43 70600005.osm.pbf
>   9651244 oct 22 23:43 70600006.osm.pbf
>  10898020 oct 22 23:43 70600007.osm.pbf
>   9764169 oct 22 23:43 70600008.osm.pbf
>   8247811 oct 22 23:43 70600009.osm.pbf
>   9444801 oct 22 23:43 70600010.osm.pbf
>   8876247 oct 22 23:43 70600011.osm.pbf
>   9218641 oct 22 23:43 70600012.osm.pbf
>   7222814 oct 22 23:43 70600013.osm.pbf
>   9883513 oct 22 23:43 70600014.osm.pbf
>
>
>
> *  9209424 oct 22 23:43 70600015.osm.pbf 11793063 oct 22 23:43
> 70600016.osm.pbf 10161776 oct 22 23:43 70600017.osm.pbf 10080071 oct 22
> 23:43 70600018.osm.pbf*
>
> Does this sound right to you?
>
> Thanks!
> Enrico
>
>
> _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20141023/0341c0de/attachment-0001.html>