[mkgmap-dev] Optimizing MapSplitter
From Andrzej Popowski popej at poczta.onet.pl on Wed Nov 12 22:19:13 GMT 2014
Hi Gerd, I have prepared a tile in a way you have suggested. See files here: http://files.mkgmap.org.uk/download/224/test.7z Archive include following maps: 29483019.img - map compiled by mkgmap with mkgm-test.bat 29483018.img - map recompiled by cGPSmapper with TreSize=511 29483017.img - map recompiled by cGPSmapper with default TreSize I have included OSM data and mp source too. You can create img for device using included mk_device.bat. My observations are following: All maps are work quite good in device, it is not easy to tell which is the fastest. I can measure differences in redraw time between both version of cgpsmapper maps, the one with TreSize=511 can be up to 50% faster in some operations (measured in nuvi 1440). Map compiled with mkgmap is fast, as good as faster version of cgpsmapper. Since mkgmap creates fast maps, I'm not sure now, if subdivision size is so important. Maybe not, or maybe there is still some room for improvement in mkgmap? -- Best regards, Andrzej
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] Optimizing MapSplitter
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] Optimizing MapSplitter
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list