[mkgmap-dev] Driving on Trail

Mon Nov 17 08:35:30 GMT 2014

Hi Uli,

I would understand this when the style adds two routable
ways for the same OSM way. Garmin maps don't
use this trick, so I would not be surprised to see
that they can't handle it properly.
We already noticed that with the cycleways added by the 
--make-opposite-cycleways option.

Gerd

> Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 01:28:23 -0700
> From: ulibaer at gmail.com
> To: mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Driving on Trail
> 
> GerdP wrote
> > Hi Brian,
> > 
> > I never saw this text on my Oregon. If I got you right, 
> > you have two routable lines for the same OSM way,
> > the device routes you over the way for the car,
> > but it displays the info for the sidewalk.
> > Could this be the reason?
> > 
> > Gerd
> 
> Hi Gerd,
> 
> i can second this behavior on my etrex Vista. The unit definitely routes on
> the sideway/bicycle-way and on the next crossing it tries to route onto the
> main road. I don't get it, how it "thinks", i am on the sideway, when there
> *is* a road and it is in car mode. :?
> 
> I will try to filter "unwanted" data out of the dataset with osmfilter.
> 
> Declaring the sideways not routeable would render the "route for
> pedestrians"-mode useless, i think?
> 
> Uli
> 
> 
> 
> --
> View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Driving-on-Trail-tp5824491p5824566.html
> Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20141117/50f0c1fd/attachment.html>