[mkgmap-dev] open issues in the housenumber2 branch
From GerdP gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com on Sun Mar 1 13:45:23 GMT 2015
Hi Andrzej, reg. missing data: The question is if the users prefers to see that we are guessing or not. reg. "precise address search": interesting idea. I did not think about that until now. Is is possible to have roads in NET and index etc. without referencing them in NOD? I guess yes, because I don't see any code line in the housenumber code that makes sure that the road is rendered at level 0. Gerd popej wrote > Hi Gerd, > > > How should we handle "missing" information? > > You can't guess if there is no house with missing number or there is one > but not mapped in OSM data. So none solution would cover all cases. I > would take the solution, which looks better in your code ;) > > What do you think about implementing precise address search in mkgmap? > > I mean: change each address point into a short line (like 10m) of > predefined type and give a single house number to this line. There could > be some more complex cases, like house number "3/5" which can be > supported too. > > The line for address doesn't need to contain routing data in NOD, only > house number in NET. > > -- > Best regards, > Andrzej > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > mkgmap-dev at .org > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/open-issues-in-the-housenumber2-branch-tp5835368p5835386.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] open issues in the housenumber2 branch
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] open issues in the housenumber2 branch
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list