[mkgmap-dev] Patch v2 and thoughts about class names

Wed Apr 22 16:34:18 BST 2015

Hi Steve,

okay, fine. Any ideas for the names of the sub classes? 

I am not so sure that we should call 0 an invalid number, I think I read
somewhere
that 0 is used. Taginfo also reports that, but that doesn't mean they are
correct,
as I also see -1 in Canvec imports. 

Gerd

Steve Ratcliffe wrote
> I'm all for using Numbers as the top level class name.
> 
> You probably noticed that I added a check for negative and zero number in
> netcheck. Found a few in a UK map, so good catch.
> 
> ..Steve
> 
> 
>>
>>So, maybe we should keep the name Numbers for the topmost class as it
>>also coresponds to the
>>name in the polish format?
>>
>>Gerd
>>
>>
>> 		 	   		  
>>
>>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>mkgmap-dev mailing list
>>

> mkgmap-dev at .org

>>http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list

> mkgmap-dev at .org

> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev

--
View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Patch-v2-and-thoughts-about-class-names-tp5841432p5841471.html
Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.