[mkgmap-dev] process-exits and Oregon 600
From Bernd Weigelt weigelt.bernd at web.de on Wed Jun 3 17:33:52 BST 2015
Hi Gerd As i am remember, WanMil presumed to use 0x07 as the second part, i use this in my style Bernd Hier sollte eigentlich eine Signatur stehen. -----Original Message----- From: GerdP <gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com> To: mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk Sent: Mi., 03 Juni 2015 18:10 Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] process-exits and Oregon 600 Hi Michael, michael lohr wrote > Finally found the reason: my style assigns generic names to unnamed > roads, so the segments of a motorway_link were named "GENERIC_NAME", > "EXIT_HINT", "GENERIC_NAME". As soon as a name is present on either the > 1st or the 3rd segment the Oregon would use this name for routing (btw, > contrary the my previous posts: the Oregon 450 also behaves like that). > > Which brings up this question: why not assign the exit_hint to all 3 > segments in the first place? My understanding is that the style should be able to use a different type (not 0x08 / 0x09) for that small 2nd part, so that Garmin uses the name of it as a hint. Gerd -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/process-exits-and-Oregon-600-tp5845444p5846973.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] Commit: r3605: merge the housenumber2 branch
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] Exception with location-autofill option on r3605
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list