[mkgmap-dev] process-exits and Oregon 600
From Gerd Petermann gpetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com on Thu Jun 4 06:19:02 BST 2015
Hi Micha, I cannot yet reproduce your result. I tried this: Add the line highway=motorway_link & mkgmap:label:1!=* { set mkgmap:label:1 = 'Exit' } in the default style file at line 65, before the line highway=* {name '${name}' | '${ref}' } Execute mkgmap with options --route --process-exits --process-destinationand this modified style. I see the right hint for node 988993419. Maybe you placed the line before those for the exit hint? In that case it is clear that the exit hints don't work because those rules use the name action which has no effect when mkgmap:label:1 is already set. If that doesn't help, please provide more details. Gerd Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2015 18:47:00 +0200 From: micha.lohr at web.de To: mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] process-exits and Oregon 600 Hi Gerd, hi Bernd it works because the default style does not name the outer segments (intentionally?). My style treated exits pretty much the same way, with one addition: highway=motorway_link & mkgmap:label:1!=* { set mkgmap:label:1 = 'Exit' } Deleting this line and so not naming the outer segments did the trick. As far as I can tell, line type does not make any difference. Micha Am 03.06.2015 um 18:29 schrieb GerdP: Hi Michael, please check how the default style uses the hint. I think it works fine. Gerd michael lohr wrote Hi Gerd, my 1st assumption was that I set the road_speed too high, and the routing would "jump" overthe 2nd part to the 3rd, 2nd assumption was to use a different line type - changing both things made no difference. Am 03.06.2015 um 17:59 schrieb GerdP: Hi Michael, michael lohr wrote Finally found the reason: my style assigns generic names to unnamed roads, so the segments of a motorway_link were named "GENERIC_NAME", "EXIT_HINT", "GENERIC_NAME". As soon as a name is present on either the 1st or the 3rd segment the Oregon would use this name for routing (btw, contrary the my previous posts: the Oregon 450 also behaves like that). Which brings up this question: why not assign the exit_hint to all 3 segments in the first place? My understanding is that the style should be able to use a different type (not 0x08 / 0x09) for that small 2nd part, so that Garmin uses the name of it as a hint. Gerd -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/process-exits-and-Oregon-600-tp5845444p5846973.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev at .org http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev at .org http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/process-exits-and-Oregon-600-tp5845444p5846980.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20150604/08286a52/attachment.html>
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] process-exits and Oregon 600
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] process-exits and Oregon 600
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list