[mkgmap-dev] Should we exclued bridges from housenumber processing?
From Richard Welty rwelty at averillpark.net on Sun Jun 7 02:52:28 BST 2015
On 6/6/15 7:30 PM, Greg Troxel wrote: > I don't see why an address shouldn't be valid just because it's on a > road that happens to be a bridge. It would be good to get pointers to > the situations where people think this proposed rule makes sense, and > we can then see if we think there are tagging errors. there are bridges in old European cities which have buildings with addresses physically on the bridge. such a rule would be problematic. richard -- rwelty at averillpark.net Averill Park Networking - GIS & IT Consulting OpenStreetMap - PostgreSQL - Linux Java - Web Applications - Search -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 841 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20150606/6b8e34f8/attachment.sig>
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] Should we exclued bridges from housenumber processing?
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] GUI for POI Search TYPES
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list