[mkgmap-dev] Problem with aeroway=aerodrome as a relation

Thu Sep 24 08:32:54 BST 2015

Hi Nelson,

there is no special java code in mkgmap to treat aeroways.
I guess you don't use the default style, so I can't say what goes wrong.
A good tool to find out what mkgmap writes to the img file is
GPSMapEdit.
Use it to open the corresponding img file and double click into the area
you want to analyse. It shows you what Garmin type the area has.
Press escape to close the dialog box followed by
delete to remove that polygon. Repeat this process until GPSMapEdit 
shows something like
"Area of map coverage (0x4b, polygon)"

If you do this for both img files (the good and the bad one) you
should be able to find out what's different.

Gerd

> Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 23:45:05 -0300
> From: naoliv at gmail.com
> To: mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> Subject: [mkgmap-dev] Problem with aeroway=aerodrome as a relation
> 
> Could somehow mkgmap have an issue with aeroway=aerodrome as a
> relation? (instead a simple closed way)
> 
> For example, this airport http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/90834745
> have its internal grasses properly represented like here:
> http://cocardl.com.br/pv/viracopos.jpg
> 
> On the other hand, this airport
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3896781 seems to overlap every
> internal feature (like grasses): http://cocardl.com.br/pv/galeao.jpg
> 
> Is mkgmap giving different treatments for aeroway=aerodrome as a
> closed way and as a relation?
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20150924/500c1668/attachment.html>