[mkgmap-dev] Problem with aeroway=aerodrome as a relation
From thundercel at gpsinfo.com.br thundercel at gpsinfo.com.br on Thu Sep 24 13:58:03 BST 2015
Yes Gerd, Without a typ file it has a higher priority, but we use the defaul the Mkgmap TYP and did not intend to date to develop a custom TYP. Have some form of the Mkgmap level make him take that priority polygon used for airport or aerodrome? Marcio From: Gerd Petermann Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 9:38 AM To: mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Problem with aeroway=aerodrome as a relation Hi Marcio, yes, I found similar results. Without a typ file, the 0x07 polygon seems to have the higher draw priority. Gerd -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: thundercel at gpsinfo.com.br To: mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 09:35:30 -0300 Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Problem with aeroway=aerodrome as a relation Hi Gerd, assisting Nelson, using the default style we have ever encountered the first problem is the style does not look landuse = grass forcing us to include in inc / landuse_polygons line landuse = grass [0x17 resolution 20]. Using the default style (with grass included) we only have succeeded using the "comment out" in the following polygons lines of "default style": :# aeroway=airport [0x07 resolution 20] # aeroway=aerodrome [0x07 resolution 20] Marcio -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20150924/2ab0981d/attachment-0001.html>
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] Problem with aeroway=aerodrome as a relation
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] Problem with aeroway=aerodrome as a relation
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list