[mkgmap-dev] don't route through highway=construction
From Greg Troxel gdt at ir.bbn.com on Wed Oct 14 00:22:06 BST 2015
Richard Welty <rwelty at averillpark.net> writes: > On 10/13/15 10:34 AM, Greg Troxel wrote: >> I agree that 'highway=construction' should be omitted from routing. >> That to me indicates "they are building a road but it is not usable". >> If the default style routes over that, it's just a bug and should be >> fixed. > last time i looked highway=construction didn't imply access at all, > leaving it to the mapper to set access= appropriately. It doesn't explicitly, but there's a strong implication that highway=construction is for unusable roads - because construction=minor is for usable roads with construction activity. Quoting: For minor road-works (where the road in question remains open), use construction=minor (and don't use highway=construction, but leave it at its default value). > this makes sense, because sometimes construction is impassible and > sometimes it's not. repairs and resurfacing etc. are generally passable and that's what construction=minoris for. A new road that has been proposed and is now being built is essentially never passable. Or once it is, it's time to retag it has highway=secondary or whatever and add construction=minor. > unfortunately, the wiki doesn't really explain this and what mappers > and data consumers are actually doing seems variable and inconsistent. True, it's a mess like all things wiki :-) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 180 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/attachments/20151013/8d51b2f7/attachment.sig>
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] don't route through highway=construction
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] address search in Canada
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list