[mkgmap-dev] Hiding long tunnels from map view while keeping them routable
From Gerd Petermann GPetermann_muenchen at hotmail.com on Tue Oct 20 09:44:07 BST 2015
Hi Marko, I don't know any way to hide an object in the map without a typ file, besides that I would not want to hide it completely. Gerd ________________________________________ Von: mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk <mkgmap-dev-bounces at lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Marko Mäkelä <marko.makela at iki.fi> Gesendet: Dienstag, 20. Oktober 2015 09:47 An: Development list for mkgmap Betreff: [mkgmap-dev] Hiding long tunnels from map view while keeping them routable On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 12:03:52AM -0700, GerdP wrote: >Esp. the tags which express a planned (or not yet planned) status are >problematic, they may be non-existent bridges or tunnels. Speaking of tunnels, would it be technically possible to hide tunnels from the map view, while keeping them in the routing graph? This could be useful in urban areas. A few years ago, I added rules to hide unrouteable tunnels, such as highway=service,access=private, or railway tunnels (subways). A separate discussion is whether it is practically feasible to hide such tunnels from the map display in the default style. In my opinion, it would be. As long as the tunnel exists in the routing graph, it can be used for routing (typically, for cars only). Pedestrians and bicyclists or anyone who is at the street level would not be confused by seeing the map cluttered with the "bogus" road. Best regards, Marko _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev at lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
- Previous message: [mkgmap-dev] Hiding long tunnels from map view while keeping them routable
- Next message: [mkgmap-dev] re Commit: r3644: add portugese spelling for Brasil / Brazil
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the mkgmap-dev mailing list